update funder acks in acknowledgements.md #520
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
✅ Deploy Preview for wcag2ict ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
|
Hi @shawna-slh OK. just one question. Acknowledgements, first paragraph, last sentence. "The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views [...]" Should we not put the same for the EC in the paragraph below? |
|
Thanks for checking.
We should not. That is wording specifically required for the US funding. We have not used that wording for other funding, and don't want to set a precedent for it. |
maryjom
approved these changes
Sep 18, 2024
github-actions bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2024
SHA: 8cb82cc Reason: push, by maryjom Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi @daniel-montalvo
Correction from what I said earlier: We should also include the US funding that was in the first version.
This PR also puts the US funding wording together. And removes the unvetted intro sentence.
OK?