Create 2024-11-13-minutes.md

meetings/2024-11-13-minutes.md

@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+# Privacy TF Call - Wed 13 November 2024
+
+Present: Dan, Tara, Jeffrey, Don, Yves, Wendy
+Regrets: Pete, Nick
+
+https://github.com/w3ctag/privacy-principles/issues/431 collects all the PRs we need to review.
+
+### https://github.com/w3ctag/privacy-principles/pull/432
+
+*we review and agree to merge*
+
+### https://github.com/w3ctag/privacy-principles/pull/444
+
+*we leave it unmerged*
+
+### https://github.com/w3ctag/privacy-principles/pull/441
+
+Jeffrey: the objection is broad - but in the conversation it seemed like they wanted us to point out that people should consult local regulations... instead of assuming that we described everything.  
+
+*we agree to wendy's [suggestion](https://github.com/w3ctag/privacy-principles/pull/441/files#r1813083399)* 
+
+*and agree to merge*
+
+### https://github.com/w3ctag/privacy-principles/pull/442
+
+Don: giving users ability to tag info as sensitive is not especially useful (because it is possible to infer sensitive information from data that appears non-sensitive)
+
+*noting Martin's [comment](https://github.com/w3ctag/privacy-principles/pull/442/files#r1779902987) that this implies privacy labor*
+
+*consensus not to do this for various reasons including above*
+
+### https://github.com/w3ctag/privacy-principles/issues/449
+
+Jeffrey: we've had discussions in the GPC context of whether a global opt-out overrides specific agreements. Consensus may be emerging in privacy CG that if you have a specific agreement that this should override the global signal. (https://github.com/privacycg/gpc-spec/issues/80) Should we therefore make a change in the privacy principles? My sense is to leave it for this version.
+
+Dan: agree with not doing anything... Also I don't think this will make our lives easier in council.
+
+Tara: I would leave it in the understanding that this is going to be revisited... (once GPC is further developed.)
+
+### Agreement to "send this to council"
+
+Yves: the issue with the documentation included is good... 
+
+*Yves to pursue the objector.*
+
+*Yves to shuttle the current editors' draft out to /TR space.*
+
+*Jeffrey to fix something in the summary by end of today.*