vested DOT paid to Polkadot, not AssetHub #2268
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
PieWol
added
the
update docs
|
@PieWol is this (DOT vesting) implemented on the relay chain? If yes, LGMT, but IDK the technicalities here. |
semuelle
approved these changes
Apr 3, 2024
Yes. I thought we could transfer the DOT on AssetHub, but you can't vest on AssetHub. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cleaning up the template after legal seems to only be able to pay vested DOT to Polkadot native addresses in order for the funds to remain eligible for staking.
Line 17 should also somehow include that it's necessary to list a Polkadot address in the application. Suggestions welcome :)