-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(#10): collecting and sending failed links back to cloud provider via server #20
Open
tom-fitz
wants to merge
8
commits into
wasmCloud:main
Choose a base branch
from
tom-fitz:10-failed-links
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3c56a0e
feat(#10): collecting and sending failed links back to cloud provider…
tom-fitz 6fcf468
Update go.mod
tom-fitz 496b1e9
10: starting the link refactor
tom-fitz fd578f1
10: fixing merge conflicts with own branch
tom-fitz ef8d748
10: fixing up go.mod version
tom-fitz 6095e93
10: removing tool chain addition to go.mod. Sorry IDE was configured …
tom-fitz fbee7a8
10: refactoring link logic to isolate in link.go
tom-fitz f4a933b
refactored lniks and provider.go
tom-fitz File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you comment on why you removed this specific logic? With our example provider we do keep track of links explicitly, however I think in the general case providers shouldn't have to explicitly keep track of links and should be able to store whatever data necessary. Does that make sense?
Storing the links here is also necessary for the checks in the provider SDK to prevent duplicate links
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I may not be fully understanding the business logic here, or the request to refactor the link logic outside of the provider. This logic, if I'm understanding it correctly, is further down the chain and being stored as part of these functions and bubbling the error back up to the provider:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah to clarify, I like that the provider SDK itself is keeping track of the links in order to put/delete them from a map and that the developer writing a provider handler doesn't need to keep that map established (even though we do in our example)