-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 724
feat: implement extractSourceMap
option
#11814
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: implement extractSourceMap
option
#11814
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for rspack ready!Built without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #11814 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
@colinaaa There’s a related feature— extractSourceMap supports HTTP URLs. If there’s a future plan for it, it could be ported as well. |
Thanks! I've noticed that, too. I would like to port that in the next PRs. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
tests/rspack-test/configCases/source-map/extract-source-map-css/index.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
@codex review |
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Can't wait for the next one! ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. |
Summary
Port webpack/webpack#19824.
A new
extractSourceMap
option has been added to extract existing source map data from files.This is used to replace
source-map-loader
.Related links
Checklist