Skip to content

Conversation

@jugglinmike
Copy link
Contributor

Hello, reviewers! As of 2025-12-05, the wpt-pr-bot is requesting reviews from code owners for changes to WEB_FEATURES.yml files. To learn more about the purpose of these files, check out this presentation from TPAC 2025, Annotating WPT to Surface the Status of the Platform.

Matching test files for image-rendering

./css/css-images
(27 non-matching test files hidden)
(268 non-matching test files hidden)
./css/css-images/parsing
(7 non-matching test files hidden)
(6 non-matching test files hidden)

This patch re-classifies two tests that were previously attributed to the smooth web-feature (cc @stalgiag). While it's true that those tests use the value smooth, the tests only validate parsing. Since they don't verify the actual semantics of the smooth value, and since they also include all the other values, classification as image-rendering seems more appropriate.

(Those two tests were the only tests attributed to the smooth web-feature, so this likely reflects a gap in WPT's coverage.)

@foolip
Copy link
Member

foolip commented Jan 12, 2026

This patch re-classifies two tests that were previously attributed to the smooth web-feature (cc @stalgiag). While it's true that those tests use the value smooth, the tests only validate parsing. Since they don't verify the actual semantics of the smooth value, and since they also include all the other values, classification as image-rendering seems more appropriate.

(Those two tests were the only tests attributed to the smooth web-feature, so this likely reflects a gap in WPT's coverage.)

This change makes sense to me too.

@@ -1,14 +1,13 @@
features:
- name: image-orientation
- name: gradients
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note that I sorted this file while resolving merge conflicts to keep gradient* and image* together.

@foolip foolip enabled auto-merge (squash) January 12, 2026 10:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants