Skip to content

Proposed draft for QERDS deepening in EBW Definition - #271

Open
DavSanOl wants to merge 5 commits into
webuild-consortium:mainfrom
DigitelTS:ebw-definition-qerds
Open

Proposed draft for QERDS deepening in EBW Definition#271
DavSanOl wants to merge 5 commits into
webuild-consortium:mainfrom
DigitelTS:ebw-definition-qerds

Conversation

@DavSanOl

@DavSanOl DavSanOl commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Draft for the secure communication channel subsection in Blueprint Appendix D.

This PR solves #238

@DavSanOl
DavSanOl marked this pull request as ready for review July 27, 2026 08:14
@DavSanOl
DavSanOl requested review from a team, MartinRobomaze, Saramandus and sander July 27, 2026 08:14
Comment thread blueprint/appendix-ebw-definition.md Outdated
Comment thread blueprint/appendix-ebw-definition.md
@lalc
lalc requested review from eklaver, lalc and malinnorlander July 31, 2026 10:02

@lalc lalc left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on the review meeting following the PA4 and WP4 discussions, we agreed:

  • The ADR will not be the only basis for input to the Blueprint. Its classification needs vetting against eIDAS 2.0: Recital 55 lists diplomas, licences and birth certificates as attestations, although these are historical facts the ADR's table would treat as documents. The Large Scale Pilots (DC4EU, EWC, NOBID) already follow the regulation's broader reading.

  • QERDS is treated as a secure communication channel / transport, in line with eIDAS Article 3(36) and COM(2025) 838 Recital 11. The channel is payload-agnostic and does not determine the nature of what it carries.

Comment thread blueprint/appendix-ebw-definition.md Outdated
Comment thread blueprint/appendix-ebw-definition.md Outdated
@DavSanOl
DavSanOl requested review from lalc and leifj August 6, 2026 08:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants