docs(blueprint): add wallet terms to the glossary - #305
Merged
Conversation
Saramandus
approved these changes
Aug 26, 2026
gfour
approved these changes
Aug 27, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The glossary defines Wallet Unit Attestation and Business Wallet Unit Attestation in terms of a Wallet Unit, but Wallet Unit itself is missing. Chapter 3 and Appendix E also use wallet type names that the glossary does not carry.
This adds the two entries. The wording for Wallet Unit comes from the approved specifications rather than from the ARF: CS-04 §4 and CS-05 §4 for the term, CS-04 §6 for the key binding relationship, and the existing WUA entry for consistency.
Wallet Type points to Appendix E instead of repeating the three types here, so there is one place to maintain.