Put elements in CSS in alphabetical order

[Psychpsyo]

That's all this does. The spec is functionally identical.
Prompted by #2444 over at Ladybird.

---

/rendering.html ( diff )

[domenic]

Whoops, I suspect that I just did my mental alphabetization incorrectly when introducing the search element. Nice.

Can you sign the participant agreement? Also feel free to add yourself to the Acknowledgments section if you'd like.

[Psychpsyo]

Can you sign the participant agreement? Also feel free to add yourself to the Acknowledgments section if you'd like.

Do I need to put my city into the agreement or can I put only my country?
Cause I'd rather not put where I live, down to the city in there. (I know it's not made public, but I'd still rather not)

[domenic]

Umm, we'll have to ask the lawyers on that, which could take some time (~weeks) to resolve :(

[Psychpsyo]

Umm, we'll have to ask the lawyers on that, which could take some time (~weeks) to resolve :(

Then I probably won't for now, sorry.
I hope this PR can still be of use somehow. I don't need it attributed to me or anything, I'd just like this to be fixed.
(without having to explicitly share (close to) my home address, as that doesn't seem relevant or necessary)

[Psychpsyo]

Been thinking about this more, and while I don't like having to give my address and don't think that should be a requirement, I'll sign it.
Unfortunately, I typo'd my Github username the first time round, so I need to get my email out of the system first.
Opened a PR for that here: whatwg/participant-data#80

[domenic]

Oh, looking at your PR, I have potentially more bad news: we need the legal name that you use to sign documents, not a pseudonym or online handle. I can understand if that is not reasonable (especially concerned with your concerns about location), as it has been a blocker for several other contributors in the past: whatwg/sg#93

[Psychpsyo]

Oh, looking at your PR, I have potentially more bad news: we need the legal name that you use to sign documents, not a pseudonym or online handle. I can understand if that is not reasonable (especially concerned with your concerns about location), as it has been a blocker for several other contributors in the past: whatwg/sg#93

That's indeed a deal breaker then, sorry.
I will close this PR and instead open an issue on the standard that someone other than me can address. (#10788)
I assume that bypasses any of this, especially when the PR in the case you linked got merged via someone else re-opening the same thing as a new PR, pretty much verbatim.

Also, I do think that the agreement should clearly state what exactly is required and why.
(i.e. That it must be your legal name for patent protection and that the address is used for... whatever it is for.)