-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use SetIntegrityLevel instead of Object.freeze() #125
Open
annevk
wants to merge
2
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
annevk/abstract-op
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This isn't correct, at least as written. The conversion, presumably to an IDL
NotificationAction
type (although that isn't stated), will re-perform the Get()s of all the properties, which can be observable if Object.prototype is modified. Then we'll convert back to JS in the binding layer.I don't think there's any way to do this rigorously as long as your return type is
FrozenArray<NotificationAction>
(instead ofFrozenArray<object>
). The conversion between JS objects and dictionaries is observable and side effecting.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I cannot use
FrozenArray
then either since it's constructor takes an IDL value. I'm not sure I want to inline all of that. That would be rather bad and I'd likely make mistakes or it would result in mismatches down the line.There is some mismatch here though with implementations I think where JS values are backed by IDL values and you can manipulate either. That's not conversion, but just grabbing the corresponding value, but IDL doesn't formalize that.