Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generate jacoco report in conformance suite #21102

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

madurangasiriwardena
Copy link
Member

@madurangasiriwardena madurangasiriwardena commented Sep 13, 2024

Part of #21117

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.


Maduranga Siriwardena seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.


for (File classDirectory : classDirectories) {
// Jar files to analyze
File[] files = classDirectory.listFiles((dir, name) -> name.startsWith("org.wso2.carbon") && !name.contains(".stub_"));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

have we considered ignoring carbon ui components?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can ignore them during the report analysis level at the module repository level.

*/
public void create() throws IOException {

// Read the jacoco.exec file. Multiple data files could be merged
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These comments can be moved as method comments

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is better suited to explain the method invocation. Improved the method comment with #21108


private void createReport(final IBundleCoverage bundleCoverage) throws IOException {

// Create a concrete report visitor based on some supplied
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Move as method comment?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done with #21108

* @return - Jar file extracted directory.
* @throws IOException - Throws if jar extraction fails
*/
public synchronized static String extractJarFile(String jarFilePath, File tempDir) throws IOException {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we really need this to be synchronized here?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done with #21108

@madurangasiriwardena madurangasiriwardena merged commit fc3d898 into wso2:master Sep 13, 2024
1 check was pending
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants