Count harness-carried model auth in surface config and admin onboarding

[haramiya]

Bug

Running HARNESS=claude on a Claude subscription (CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN from claude setup-token, no ANTHROPIC_API_KEY) serves turns fine, but the deployment tells everyone it isn't set up:

• /v1/surface-config reports modelProviderConfigured: false, so the portal 503s non-admins and bounces admins to onboarding (Route the first admin to onboarding instead of a 403 web UI #29's gate).
• The admin onboarding view says Needs a key / "claude-opus-5 cannot run until its Anthropic key is configured" — while the assistant answers happily underneath.

Root cause: both read only the model credential store, which counts anthropic/openai/openrouter API keys (env or admin-managed) and knows nothing about auth the harness carries itself. #67 and #109 both hit this and proposed fixes at different layers.

Fix

harnessCarriedModelAuth(config) in src/config.ts names the provider a harness authenticates on its own:

• claude → anthropic when CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN or ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN is in claudeProcessEnv
• codex → openai when CODEX_ACCESS_TOKEN is in codexProcessEnv
• otherwise undefined (env API keys are already counted through the credential store's fallback, so they aren't double-counted here)

Wired as an optional ServerDeps.harnessCarriedModelAuth and surfaced at the two places that were lying:

• Surface gate: getSurfaceConfig ORs it into modelProviderConfigured. Unlike making modelProviderAvailabilityFor unconditionally report claude as available (adr: smaller fix for the keyless-harness model gate #109's noted downside), a claude deployment with no token anywhere still reports unconfigured and keeps the onboarding gate.
• Admin API: GET /v1/admin/model-providers gains a sibling harnessAuth: { harnessId, provider } field. The credential-store providers statuses are deliberately untouched — anthropic keeps reporting absent when no key is stored, because those keys feed pi-transport calls and adding/deleting them is independent of harness OAuth. Old admin UI against new core ignores the extra field; new UI against old core sees no harnessAuth and behaves exactly as before (blue-green safe).
• Admin onboarding view: the model-provider step shows Ready when the base model's provider is store-configured or harness-authenticated, with the summary "claude-opus-5 · authenticated by the claude harness — no API key needed." Stored-key summaries keep precedence; the key form stays usable for feeding pi-transport.

Screenshots

Admin → Onboarding, HARNESS=claude with only CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN:

Before	After

Rendered against the admin page served with realistic stubbed API fixtures (the machine's only dev-instance Slack slot was held by another live instance, so this wasn't exercised on a booted stack; the same states are covered by the tests below).

Tests

• test/model-credential-route.test.ts: claude harness + OAuth token → modelProviderConfigured: true, harnessAuth: { harnessId: "claude", provider: "anthropic" }, and the anthropic status still { configured: false, source: "absent" }; claude harness with no token → still unconfigured, no harnessAuth field. start() now derives the dep from the test config the same way src/index.ts does.
• plugins/admin/test/onboarding-view.test.ts: runs the real loadOnboarding() (vm-extracted from index.html) against stubbed endpoints — harness auth alone → Ready badge + harness summary; no harness auth → Needs a key; stored admin key + harness auth → Ready with the stored-key summary.

Verification

• test/model-credential-route.test.ts 13/13, test/external-slack-participants.test.ts + test/admin-resources.test.ts 20/20, plugins/admin onboarding suite 7/7
• tsc --noEmit (root and plugins/admin), eslint ., prettier --check — clean (lint:ox has a pre-existing missing-native-binding failure locally; CI covers it)
• Independent fresh-context adversarial review of the diff — findings resolved before merge

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

---

^{Need help on this PR? Tag @codesmith-bot with what you need. Autofix is disabled.}

[time-attack]

This appears more precise than #267 because it checks actual harness-carried authentication rather than the harness name alone. Please rebase and run current CI; if it remains green, I recommend treating this as canonical for the harness-readiness portion of #290/#268. @16francej, can you confirm the preferred implementation?

[ReganBell]

Superseded by #690, which combines this with #126 and reconciles both with current main. Your work is credited there as co-author — thank you!

[time-attack]

Thanks for this, @haramiya — and sorry for the slow response.

We're closing this PR. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, since coding agents write most of the underlying code now, we'd rather receive feature ideas as a short human-written note in adrs/ — informal is great, just the idea in your own words — and bugs as a plain issue. If we're aligned we're happy to burn our own tokens on the implementation, and we'll credit you as co-author.

We don't want your idea to get lost, so we've captured it in #814 to triage on our side. Please feel free to open an adrs/ note if you feel strongly about the approach. Appreciate you engaging with the repo!