tree-wide: stm32: fix dma DTS phandle lists #97367
Open
+121
−121
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Correct STM32F4xx SoCs DMA lists that were not split by phandle and seemed to form unique phandles. This is not currently as issue with existing DT parsing macros and tools but may generate build errors if tools are more strict on the DTS implementation formats. Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <[email protected]>
Correct STM32H5xx SoCs DMA lists that were not split by phandle and seemed to form unique phandles. This is not currently as issue with existing DT parsing macros and tools but may generate build errors if tools are more strict on the DTS implementation formats. Clean indentation by the ways for the modified DTSI file lines. Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <[email protected]>
Correct STM32H7xx SoCs DMA lists that were not split by phandle and seemed to form unique phandles. This is not currently as issue with existing DT parsing macros and tools but may generate build errors if tools are more strict on the DTS implementation formats. Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <[email protected]>
Correct DTS file DMA lists that were not split by phandle and seemed to form unique phandles. This is not currently as issue with existing DT parsing macros and tools but may generate build errors if tools are more strict on the DTS implementation formats. Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <[email protected]>
zephyrbot
added
area: Boards/SoCs
area: Modem
area: Samples
zephyrbot
requested review from
FRASTM,
GeorgeCGV,
bjarki-andreasen,
dcpleung,
decsny,
djiatsaf-st,
erwango,
gautierg-st,
jukkar,
marwaiehm-st,
mathieuchopstm,
rlubos,
tbursztyka,
teburd and
tomi-font
…lists Correct nucleo_wba55cg board DTS overlay file DMA lists that was not split by phandle and seemed to form a unique phandle. This is not currently an issue with existing DT parsing macros and tools but may generate build errors if tools are more strict on the DTS implementation format. Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <[email protected]>
Correct stm32h573i_dk DTS overlay file DMA list that was not split by phandle and seemed to form unique phandle. This is not currently an issue with existing DT parsing macros and tools but may generate build errors if tools are more strict on the DTS implementation format. Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <[email protected]>
Correct b_u858i_iot02a DTS overlay file DMA lists that was not split by phandle and seemed to form a unique phandle. This is not currently an issue with existing DT parsing macros and tools but may generate build errors if tools are more strict on the DTS implementation format. Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <[email protected]>
Correct STM32 boards DTS overlay files DMA lists that were not split by phandle and seemed to form unique phandles. This is not currently an issue with existing DT parsing macros and tools but may generate build errors if tools are more strict on the DTS implementation format. Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <[email protected]>
Correct STM32 boards DTS overlay files DMA lists that were not split by phandle and seemed to form a unique phandle. This is not currently an issue with existing DT parsing macros and tools but may generate build errors if tools are more strict on the DTS implementation format. Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <[email protected]>
Correct b_u585i_iot02a board DTS overlay file DMA lists that was not split by phandle and seemed to form a unique phandle. This is not currently an issue with existing DT parsing macros and tools but may generate build errors if tools are more strict on the DTS implementation format. Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <[email protected]>
etienne-lms
force-pushed
the
stm32-dma-props
branch
from
8f83eb3 to
129422c
Compare
|
erwango
reviewed
Oct 13, 2025
Comment on lines
-9
to
+10
| dmas = <&dma2 5 3 0x28440 0x03 | ||
| &dma2 2 3 0x28480 0x03>; | ||
| dmas = <&dma2 5 3 0x28440 0x03>, | ||
| <&dma2 2 3 0x28480 0x03>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Side note: We should also consider moving these to STM32_DMA_ macros usage
erwango
approved these changes
Oct 13, 2025
mathieuchopstm
approved these changes
Oct 14, 2025
Existing files actually contain perfectly valid constructs per the DT Specification as far as I understand it: 
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Correct STM32 SoC DTSI files and samples/tests DTS overlay files where DMA lists are not split by phandle and seemed to form unique phandles. This is not an issue with existing DT parsing macros and tools but may generate build errors if tools are more strict on the DTS implementation format.
No functional changes.