Remove the extra 'Tx' string in the hash

[yedeyu]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Corrected example outputs in tutorial documentation to ensure accuracy.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[vercel]

@yedeyu is attempting to deploy a commit to the Zeta Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The change corrects textual representations in example output documentation by removing trailing "Tx" suffixes from two Cross-Chain Transaction (CCTX) identifier instances within an MDX tutorial file.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Documentation correction src/pages/developers/tutorials/hello.mdx	Removed trailing "Tx" from CCTX identifier values in example output (2 instances)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the primary change: removing extraneous 'Tx' strings from hash values in the documentation example.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Disabled knowledge base sources:

• Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b2b6791 and ab603bc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/pages/developers/tutorials/hello.mdx (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/pages/developers/tutorials/hello.mdx (1)

317-317: Verify whether a second CCTX instance was modified elsewhere in the file.

The change at line 317 correctly removes the "Tx" suffix from the CCTX identifier and aligns with the PR objective. However, only this single line is annotated with the ~ marker, while the AI summary references "both instances."

Confirm whether:

1. A second CCTX identifier instance exists in the file that should also have been modified, or
2. The summary incorrectly implies multiple locations when describing the single line change.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}