Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(zetacore): add default cctx list pagination size #2871

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 12, 2024

Conversation

gartnera
Copy link
Member

@gartnera gartnera commented Sep 12, 2024

This endpoint returns all CCTXs. It takes about 15 minutes to respond on mainnet and degrades RPC providers. Add a default page size to ensure the response is fast by default.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a default pagination limit of 100 for cross-chain transaction queries, enhancing usability.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of requests without pagination parameters, ensuring no errors are returned.
  • Tests

    • Added comprehensive tests for the CctxAll method to validate functionality under different pagination scenarios.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 12, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new constant, DefaultPageSize, set to 100, which is utilized in the CctxAll function to manage pagination. If the request lacks pagination or specifies a limit of zero, the function initializes pagination with this default value. Additionally, a new test function, TestKeeper_CctxAll, has been added to validate the behavior of the CctxAll method under various conditions, including handling empty requests and ensuring correct pagination behavior.

Changes

Files Change Summary
x/crosschain/keeper/grpc_query_cctx.go Added constant DefaultPageSize with a value of 100 for default pagination in the CctxAll function.
x/crosschain/keeper/grpc_query_cctx_test.go Introduced TestKeeper_CctxAll function with three sub-tests to validate the CctxAll method: handling empty requests, verifying default page size, and testing custom page size functionality.

Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1929ff6 and 2474213.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • x/crosschain/keeper/grpc_query_cctx.go (2 hunks)
  • x/crosschain/keeper/grpc_query_cctx_test.go (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (2)
x/crosschain/keeper/grpc_query_cctx.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

x/crosschain/keeper/grpc_query_cctx_test.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

Additional comments not posted (3)
x/crosschain/keeper/grpc_query_cctx.go (2)

23-24: LGTM!

The constant DefaultPageSize is well-named and follows the Go naming convention. The value of 100 is a reasonable default for pagination.


51-56: Excellent handling of pagination!

The code segment correctly initializes the pagination when it is not provided in the request and sets a default limit when the specified limit is 0. This ensures a robust pagination behavior and prevents potential issues with unbounded queries.

The code is clear, concise, and follows best practices for handling pagination in gRPC queries.

x/crosschain/keeper/grpc_query_cctx_test.go (1)

293-328: LGTM!

The TestKeeper_CctxAll function is a well-structured and comprehensive test for the CctxAll method. It covers important scenarios related to pagination, including empty requests, default page size, and custom page size.

The sub-tests are focused, have clear descriptions, and make specific assertions about the expected behavior. The use of helper functions for test setup improves readability and maintainability.

Overall, this test function enhances the test coverage for the CctxAll method and ensures that it behaves correctly under various pagination-related conditions.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 66.94%. Comparing base (1929ff6) to head (2474213).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2871   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    66.93%   66.94%           
========================================
  Files          373      373           
  Lines        21028    21032    +4     
========================================
+ Hits         14076    14080    +4     
  Misses        6288     6288           
  Partials       664      664           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
x/crosschain/keeper/grpc_query_cctx.go 91.66% <100.00%> (+0.36%) ⬆️

@lumtis lumtis added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 12, 2024
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 19c929c Sep 12, 2024
31 of 32 checks passed
@lumtis lumtis deleted the cctx-default-page-size branch September 12, 2024 20:13
gartnera added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2024
* fix(zetacore): add default cctx list pagination size

* add unit tests
gartnera added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2024
* fix(zetacore): add default cctx list pagination size

* add unit tests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants