feat: network monitor transport layer integration

[SantiagoPittella]

Warning

This PR aims to main.

This PR adds note transport layer support for the network monitor. It works by using the health check endpoint of the given service (https://github.com/0xMiden/miden-note-transport/blob/main/crates/node/src/node/grpc/mod.rs#L87)

Also, add a copy button for the URLs of the services to be easily accesible and re-arranges the order of the cards.

[Mirko-von-Leipzig]

Is there value in actually exercising the transport layer instead of relying on its self-reporting?

(for example, our own "health" report in the node might just always return Ok(200) 😬)

[SantiagoPittella]

Current view of the monitor:

[SantiagoPittella]

Is there value in actually exercising the transport layer instead of relying on its self-reporting?

Yes, there's value in that. I mostly wanted to have a first version introducing the transport layer, at least with an idea if the service is accessible.

[SantiagoPittella]

@Mirko-von-Leipzig is there a chance for the branch protection rules to have a typo? and be requiring "tests" instead of "test"?

[Mirko-von-Leipzig]

@Mirko-von-Leipzig is there a chance for the branch protection rules to have a typo? and be requiring "tests" instead of "test"?

The issue is that I refactored tests workflow into ci/tests job and the branch protection rules for main still reference tests. This was fixed for next but has not yet been done for main cc @bobbinth

[bobbinth]

The issue is that I refactored tests workflow into ci/tests job and the branch protection rules for main still reference tests. This was fixed for next but has not yet been done for main cc @bobbinth

Should be all good now.