Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

multisem wafer 60 and 61 first pass #16

Open
wants to merge 56 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

multisem wafer 60 and 61 first pass #16

wants to merge 56 commits into from

Conversation

trautmane
Copy link
Member

My first pass at changes to handle wafers 60 and 61 using @templiert 's new xlog data and utilities ...

trautmane and others added 30 commits November 2, 2024 06:41
feat(ingestion_ibeammsem): get_xys_sfov_and_paths
docs(ingestion_ibeammsem): type hint and overlook in docstring
…e no longer symmetrical (still need to break up build_mfov_column_group into smaller functions)
…r and allow for it to be omitted for single wafer data sets
trautmane and others added 26 commits November 14, 2024 06:46
review of msem_tile_trimmer
…nd 'tkagg' which requires the 'tk' interactive framework, as 'headless' is currently running"
…also using blockFactorXY 1 instead of default 8 to avoid OOM with larger 1024,1024,maxZ blocks
…ghbors parameter, and bump up xyNeighborFactor from 0.3 to 0.6 to fix missing match problem for wafer 60 slab 399 MFOVs that have a larger overlap
…rrection code. The basicpy dependency required a much newer pydantic. I updated the pydantic dependency, but needed to remove the fibsem-tools dependency because it limits pydantic versions. We don't need fibsem-tools for multi-SEM, but this will make it more difficult to merge the multisem branch back to the main branch.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants