skeleton: agent 叙事管道计划 v1（§10.1.1 促升） - #1903
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 58 minutes You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbit
Walkthrough新增 Tiandao narration pipeline v1 计划，并更新重构计划的阶段依赖与 schema 规则。开发命令现在使用共享操作员权限门控。E2E 脚本和测试覆盖操作员环境、命令范围及执行拦截。 Changes计划与评审规则更新
开发命令操作员门控
Estimated code review effort: 4 (Complex) | ~45 minutes Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant E2E as E2E 脚本
participant Server as 开发服务器
participant Permissions as DevCommandPermissions
participant Client as 客户端
participant Command as 开发命令拦截器
E2E->>Server: 设置 BONG_OPERATORS 和离线授权
Server->>Permissions: 初始化操作员权限
Client->>Server: 建立连接并提交用户名
Server->>Permissions: 同步 bong.dev 作用域
Client->>Command: 执行开发命令
Command->>Permissions: 检查 is_operator
Permissions-->>Command: 返回授权结果
Command-->>Client: 放行命令或发送权限提示
Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
✨ Simplify code
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Central reviewDecision: Validated findings[major] NarrationV1 validation is ordered before the value exists
Stage 3 requires running the Root cause: the plan conflates validation of the source event payload with validation of the rendered narrationv1 output and consequently specifies the output validator on the wrong side of the renderer boundary. [major] Pub/Sub inputs cannot satisfy the proposed pre-ingest crash recovery
The proposed ingest protocol says every Redis channel is acknowledged only after the pending write and that a crash before that write is recovered by source redelivery. That recovery path does not exist for the current production inputs: Root cause: the plan models redis pub/sub delivery as an acknowledged, replayable queue. pub/sub message callbacks have neither an acknowledgement operation nor source retention, so pending-store persistence cannot be made atomic with consumption and cannot recover a crash that occurs before the pending write. [major] Mandatory
|
Central reviewDecision: Validated findings[major] P0 incorrectly marks the still-deferred F05 privacy decision as closed
P0 says Root cause: the phase gate labels f05 closed while the same plan leaves f05's policy explicitly deferred and makes later work conditional on unresolved authorization data and an enforcing consumer. this gives implementers conflicting completion criteria and can allow p1/p5 acceptance to proceed without a defined privacy/fan-out protocol. [major] Redis client resolution cannot satisfy the plan's lossless and single-side-effect guarantees
The plan defines Root cause: the design treats redis client acknowledgement as durable end-to-end confirmation even though plain pub/sub provides neither subscriber delivery acknowledgement nor a wire-level idempotency key. that acknowledgement boundary cannot simultaneously guarantee no loss during consumer unavailability and no duplicate visible side effect during crash recovery. the plan must either weaken acceptance to explicit at-least-once/possible-loss semantics or include a production consumer acknowledgement/deduplication contract before deleting pending state. [major] Bound the dead-letter sink used by terminal failure paths
A realistic sustained failure path reaches this store: every publish rejection is retried only up to a maximum and then moved to Root cause: the proposed resource-bound contract applies only to pending work and worker concurrency; it treats dead-letter as an indefinitely retained terminal sink without specifying any lifecycle or storage bound. since multiple normal failure policies continuously feed that sink, bounded pending does not bound total pipeline storage. |
Central reviewDecision: Validated findings[major] Add a positive broadcast case to the centralized route contract
P4 introduces a centralized route policy with explicit Root cause: the planned regression matrix does not cover every variant of the changed narrationscope routing contract; it omits the positive broadcast transition even though p4 centralizes and replaces all runtime routing. [major] #1590 misclassifies the documented
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md`:
- Around line 389-391: 将 §10 的最后一节标题从“10.6 单次 consume-plan 收口”重命名为“10.6 单次
consume-plan 全自动到 merge”，保留现有正文内容，并确保该章节仍是 §10 的最后一节。
- Around line 332-336: 在该容量与生命周期策略表中新增 pending policy row，明确其
max_items、max_bytes、单条 max_payload_bytes、retention_ttl、cleanup/archive owner
及满载时的处理策略。同步扩展验收证据，持续注入 pending 写入与恢复场景，验证 item/byte/TTL 上限、过期清理以及满载 overflow
telemetry，并继续断言 pending 始终有界。
- Around line 365-383: 在“每 PR 的验证与文档更新”和“独立实施上下文”中补充可执行提交门禁：每个逻辑单元使用一个 atomic
commit，commit message 必须为中文，且 agent 生成的每个 commit 包含调用前解析的精确模型 ID 对应的 Model
trailer。将 Agent 示例中的 model: "opus" 改为精确模型 ID，并要求该 ID 写入 commit trailer，不得仅写入 PR
body；同时明确禁止 --no-verify、--no-gpg-sign、未经确认的 force push、hard reset、amend 和交互式
rebase。
🪄 Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 99c26e9a-77b6-4a77-8f2d-6506b7c7a65a
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md
📜 Review details
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
docs/**/*.md
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (docs/CLAUDE.md)
docs/**/*.md: 新 plan 头部必须写明接入面：进料、出料、复用的共享类型/event/schema、server/agent/client 跨仓库契约，以及对应的worldview.md锚点。
涉及真元、灵气、衰减、逸散、半衰、距离损耗、排斥或吸力的 plan，必须调用qi_physics；新物理常数和公式必须先扩展qi_physics，不得在功能 plan 中重复实现。
所有真元/灵气流动必须遵守守恒律并通过qi_physics::ledger::QiTransfer；释放使用qi_release_to_zone，吸收使用qi_excretion，不得凭空生成或销毁真元。
涉及玩家可感知行为的 plan，必须在对应机制阶段中内联可直接实现的粒子、音效、HUD、环境、动画和 narration 规格；不得将视听内容笼统推迟到独立阶段。纯 server 逻辑 plan 例外。
每份 plan 必须列出开放问题；实施前必须追加§N.1 决议，逐项给出结论、实施方案、边界条件，并以文件:行号和 plan 章节双锚点落地。
scope 大于或等于 4 个 PR 的 plan，必须在末尾包含§10 实施工作流，并按依赖顺序在一个 plan 内序列化多个 PR，不得拆成多个 plan。
涉及 NBT 建筑、worldgen layout 或复杂视觉资产的 TODO，必须完成三轮提交：(round 1/3)、(round 2/3)、(round 3/3)；终轮提交必须包含拼写准确的<PROMISE>担保块。
§10 最末必须包含“单次 consume-plan 全自动到 merge”章节，明确用户提交/consume-plan后即可等待最终归档至docs/finished_plans/。引用世界观内容时统一使用
worldview.md §X L<line>格式；不得自动修改docs/worldview.md或主动回写docs/library/。
Files:
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md
docs/plans-skeleton/**/*.md
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
新 plan 必须先读取
docs/CLAUDE.md；骨架、Active 和 Finished plan 必须遵循三态流转及规定的阶段状态、Finish Evidence 结构。
Files:
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md
**/*
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
**/*: commit message 必须使用中文，每个逻辑单元一个 atomic commit；agent 生成的 commit 必须带真实模型Model: <精确模型 id>trailer。
禁止使用--no-verify、--no-gpg-sign、关闭签名配置、未经确认的 force push、hard reset、amend 或交互式 rebase。
禁止留下 auto-stash 产生的孤儿 WIP stash；自动 stash 流程完成后必须恢复自己的 stash。
Files:
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md
🧠 Learnings (3)
📚 Learning: 2026-07-17T00:31:10.779Z
Learnt from: Kizunad
Repo: Kizunad/Bong PR: 1218
File: docs/plans-skeleton/plan-skill-av-relink-v1.md:1-1
Timestamp: 2026-07-17T00:31:10.779Z
Learning: 在审查该仓库 `docs/plans-skeleton/` 下的“docs-only skeleton plan”创建类 PR 时：先核对 `docs/CLAUDE.md` 中“Plan 消费规范”，并逐份查看本计划文档里的“§10 实施工作流”，确认后续实施阶段是否会遵循“每个 PR 只修改一个 plan”，且实施/归档时不会出现跨 plan 的修改。该规则不适用于用户显式指定、共享调研基线且计划之间存在互相交叉引用的 skeleton plan 同批创建 PR；对这类情况应按实际交叉引用关系放宽，确保仍能按独立或约定的序列化方式推进。
Applied to files:
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md
📚 Learning: 2026-07-17T00:31:13.643Z
Learnt from: Kizunad
Repo: Kizunad/Bong PR: 1218
File: docs/plans-skeleton/plan-skill-av-relink-v1.md:81-85
Timestamp: 2026-07-17T00:31:13.643Z
Learning: 审核 docs/plans-skeleton/*.md 下的 skeleton 草案 PR 时：不得要求作者在“§N 开放问题（P0 决策门前需收口）”核查完成之前提前填写对应的“§N.1 决议”。仅当计划进入 active 且 P0 实施前，已由 Explore agent 并行核查代码现状后，才允许追加“§N.1 决议”，且该决议需包含结论、实施方案、边界条件，并使用“文件:行号 + plan 章节”的双锚点格式。
Applied to files:
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md
📚 Learning: 2026-07-22T02:11:59.191Z
Learnt from: Kizunad
Repo: Kizunad/Bong PR: 1247
File: docs/plans-skeleton/plan-bughunt-animal-air-spawn-gravity-v1.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2026-07-22T02:11:59.191Z
Learning: 在 `docs/plans-skeleton/` 目录下的计划状态行中，若起草日期同时涉及 UTC 与本地日期（例如时区换算后可能跨到不同日期），请在该行中同时标注 UTC 起草日与本地起草日。这样可以避免基于 UTC 的时间基准在 GitHub/CodeRabbit 审查时将本地日期误判为“未来日期”。
Applied to files:
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md
[grammar] ~133-~133: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...ce issue 清单与唯一聚类 ### 4.1 publish-error-boundary（5 个 source ID；其中 4 个为 #1470 重复证据） `#1470...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
[grammar] ~145-~145: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ... P4 raw-ID 修复范围。 ### 4.3 agent-publish-idempotency（10 个 confirmed source ID） #1616 #1619 #1`...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
[grammar] ~191-~191: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...batch/event id，但这不等于当前 Pub/Sub receiver 已实现可见副作用去重。 2. 以 ordering_key 对同一 player/entity/z...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
[grammar] ~192-~192: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...yer/entity/zone 的事件串行化；不同 key 可 bounded 并发，设置全局并发上限和队列上限。 3. 将 feature cooldown、lastStatusByFaction、...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
[grammar] ~193-~193: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...confirm 后 commit 的 side effect；pipeline 在事件成功前不调用不可逆状态推进。 4. 明确 stale event、重复 event、跨 restart ti...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
[uncategorized] ~297-~297: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ... privacy closure。两项保持 §8 contract gap 与 open source issue。 - agent producer/consumer schem...
(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
[grammar] ~310-~310: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...cceptance，由各自 owner 提供独立证据。 ## 8. Open questions（P0 内收口；P0 退出前冻结依赖决策） 本节不构成 P0 entry block...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md (2)
33-33: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality无需额外修改。
本节已声明读取了计划工作流依赖的规则，其余 flow 已在 §10.6 与
Finish Evidence收尾规范中对应。
211-215: 🔒 Security & Privacy | 🟠 Major | 🏗️ Heavy liftAuthorization Bypass (CWE-862): Missing Authorization
为 player/zone target 增加授权边界。
当前 route 设计验证 canonical
(scope, target)的格式和存在性，但没有证明 producer 有权向该 player 或 zone 发布。具体路径是：Redis/producer payload → source validator →
NarrationV1validator → route →AGENT_NARRATE。如果不可信或跨租户输入可以到达 ingress，攻击者可以提交格式正确的目标并向其他玩家或区域发送 narration。请补充 producer 身份认证与 target authorization，或明确并验证 ingress 只接受受信 producer。必须增加未授权 player/zone target 的负向测试。现有的 fail-closed broadcast 规则和
#1738deferred 说明不能替代该授权控制。#!/bin/bash set -euo pipefail rg -n -C 8 \ 'RuntimeRedis|AGENT_NARRATE|publishNarrations|validateNarrationV1Contract|scope|target|authorize|authorization|authz' \ agent server || true
| ### 10.3 每 PR 的验证与文档更新 | ||
|
|
||
| - agent 代码：`cd agent/packages/tiandao && npm test`；schema source 改动先 `cd agent && npm run build -w @bong/schema`，再跑 `cd agent && npm run build`。 | ||
| - 每 PR 只完成对应阶段；测试证据写入当前 active plan 的阶段记录，最后一个 PR 才补 `## Finish Evidence` 并归档。 | ||
| - 任一实现发现需要 server/schema/client 跨栈扩展时，停在 §8 contract gap，不以 mock receipt、测试专用 authorization 或未消费 dimension 字段代替生产链。 | ||
|
|
||
| ### 10.4 独立实施上下文 | ||
|
|
||
| 主线不亲自实施 PR；每个 PR 按 `docs/CLAUDE.md §6.4` 启动独立实现 subagent，prompt 必须限定该 PR 范围、必读本节、门禁与禁止扩展的 §8 contract gap，并以 `ultrathink` 结尾： | ||
|
|
||
| ```text | ||
| Agent( | ||
| subagent_type: "claude", | ||
| model: "opus", | ||
| prompt: "<当前 PR 范围、依赖、测试与禁止项>\n\nultrathink" | ||
| ) | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| subagent 只负责实现、测试、push 与创建该 PR，不等待 review、不 merge；主线只接收 PR URL、HEAD 与简短门禁证据。执行模型、validator 与 reviewer 的真实模型 ID 必须按当时路由记录在 commit trailer/PR body，不能以模板占位名冒充实际上游模型。 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
把提交与模型身份规则写成可执行门禁。
§10.3-10.4 没有明确以下强制规则：
- 每个逻辑单元使用一个 atomic commit。
- commit message 必须使用中文。
- agent 生成的 commit 必须包含
Model: <精确模型 id>trailer。 - 禁止
--no-verify、--no-gpg-sign、未经确认的 force push、hard reset、amend 和交互式 rebase。
此外，model: "opus" 不是精确模型 ID，且 Line 383 允许把真实模型 ID 写入 PR body。请改为调用前解析的精确模型 ID，并要求每个 agent commit 写入 trailer。否则 subagent 可能生成不符合仓库规则的提交。
建议补充实施门禁
- model: "opus",
+ model: "<调用前由当前路由解析的精确模型 ID>",
...
+ - 每个逻辑单元使用一个 atomic commit，commit message 必须使用中文。
+ - 每个 agent 生成的 commit 必须包含 `Model: <精确模型 id>` trailer，不能只写入 PR body。
+ - 禁止使用 `--no-verify`、`--no-gpg-sign`、未经确认的 force push、hard reset、amend 或交互式 rebase。📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| ### 10.3 每 PR 的验证与文档更新 | |
| - agent 代码：`cd agent/packages/tiandao && npm test`；schema source 改动先 `cd agent && npm run build -w @bong/schema`，再跑 `cd agent && npm run build`。 | |
| - 每 PR 只完成对应阶段；测试证据写入当前 active plan 的阶段记录，最后一个 PR 才补 `## Finish Evidence` 并归档。 | |
| - 任一实现发现需要 server/schema/client 跨栈扩展时，停在 §8 contract gap，不以 mock receipt、测试专用 authorization 或未消费 dimension 字段代替生产链。 | |
| ### 10.4 独立实施上下文 | |
| 主线不亲自实施 PR；每个 PR 按 `docs/CLAUDE.md §6.4` 启动独立实现 subagent，prompt 必须限定该 PR 范围、必读本节、门禁与禁止扩展的 §8 contract gap，并以 `ultrathink` 结尾： | |
| ```text | |
| Agent( | |
| subagent_type: "claude", | |
| model: "opus", | |
| prompt: "<当前 PR 范围、依赖、测试与禁止项>\n\nultrathink" | |
| ) | |
| ``` | |
| subagent 只负责实现、测试、push 与创建该 PR，不等待 review、不 merge；主线只接收 PR URL、HEAD 与简短门禁证据。执行模型、validator 与 reviewer 的真实模型 ID 必须按当时路由记录在 commit trailer/PR body，不能以模板占位名冒充实际上游模型。 | |
| ### 10.3 每 PR 的验证与文档更新 | |
| - agent 代码：`cd agent/packages/tiandao && npm test`；schema source 改动先 `cd agent && npm run build -w `@bong/schema``，再跑 `cd agent && npm run build`。 | |
| - 每 PR 只完成对应阶段；测试证据写入当前 active plan 的阶段记录，最后一个 PR 才补 `## Finish Evidence` 并归档。 | |
| - 任一实现发现需要 server/schema/client 跨栈扩展时，停在 §8 contract gap，不以 mock receipt、测试专用 authorization 或未消费 dimension 字段代替生产链。 | |
| - 每个逻辑单元使用一个 atomic commit，commit message 必须使用中文。 | |
| - 每个 agent 生成的 commit 必须包含 `Model: <精确模型 id>` trailer，不能只写入 PR body。 | |
| - 禁止使用 `--no-verify`、`--no-gpg-sign`、未经确认的 force push、hard reset、amend 或交互式 rebase。 | |
| ### 10.4 独立实施上下文 | |
| 主线不亲自实施 PR；每个 PR 按 `docs/CLAUDE.md §6.4` 启动独立实现 subagent，prompt 必须限定该 PR 范围、必读本节、门禁与禁止扩展的 §8 contract gap，并以 `ultrathink` 结尾： | |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md` around lines 365 -
383, 在“每 PR 的验证与文档更新”和“独立实施上下文”中补充可执行提交门禁：每个逻辑单元使用一个 atomic commit，commit
message 必须为中文，且 agent 生成的每个 commit 包含调用前解析的精确模型 ID 对应的 Model trailer。将 Agent
示例中的 model: "opus" 改为精确模型 ID，并要求该 ID 写入 commit trailer，不得仅写入 PR body；同时明确禁止
--no-verify、--no-gpg-sign、未经确认的 force push、hard reset、amend 和交互式 rebase。
Source: Coding guidelines
| ### 10.6 单次 consume-plan 收口 | ||
|
|
||
| 用户单次提交 `/consume-plan` 后，主线按 PR-1 → PR-6 串行完成实现、review 收敛与 merge，不要求用户逐 PR 接力。所有 in-scope source 有修复/测试证据、#1738 明确保留为 open contract gap、全部阶段标记完成并补齐 `## Finish Evidence` 后，才可迁入 `docs/finished_plans/`；不得以 skeleton/关联 PR/日志可见替代真实实现关闭。 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
使用规定的 consume-plan 章节名称。
仓库规则要求 §10 最末包含“单次 consume-plan 全自动到 merge”章节。当前标题是 10.6 单次 consume-plan 收口。正文虽然描述了自动串行实现、review、merge 和归档流程，但标题不符合规定名称。
请将该节重命名为“单次 consume-plan 全自动到 merge”，并保持它为 §10 的最后一节。
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md` around lines 389 -
391, 将 §10 的最后一节标题从“10.6 单次 consume-plan 收口”重命名为“10.6 单次 consume-plan 全自动到
merge”，保留现有正文内容，并确保该章节仍是 §10 的最后一节。
Source: Coding guidelines
Central reviewDecision: Validated findings[major] Pipeline phases absorb unrelated world-model and query-tool defects
The plan assigns Root cause: the source ledger was clustered by broad agent/narration adjacency rather than by a shared implementation root cause, so unrelated world-model cloning and query-tool correctness fixes were made deliverables of the narration transport abstraction instead of receiving minimal, authoritative fixes in their own domains. [major] Register the new skeleton in the authoritative master matrix
The new plan explicitly leaves master registration for a later PR ( Root cause: the change intentionally defers the authoritative master ownership-matrix update even though the master plan requires new skeleton registration in the same intake and treats missing registration as a coverage error. [major]
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (2)
server/src/cmd/dev/season.rs (2)
130-147: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win缺少
SeasonCmd::Query的测试用例。
handle_season处理三个SeasonCmdvariant。测试覆盖了Set和Advance，没有覆盖Query。Query分支的独有行为是不改变WorldSeasonState、不发送SeasonChangedEvent、但仍返回状态消息。按编码规范，每个 enum variant 至少需要一条用例。
依据编码规范：“schema、enum 和状态机必须有专属 pin 测试；TypeBox/serde variant 要有正反 sample 对拍，每个 enum variant 和状态转换至少有一条用例。”
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@server/src/cmd/dev/season.rs` around lines 130 - 147, 为 handle_season 增加覆盖 SeasonCmd::Query 的专属测试用例，验证查询返回当前状态消息，同时不修改 WorldSeasonState 且不发送 SeasonChangedEvent；保留现有 Set 和 Advance 测试，并遵循已有测试的断言与构造方式。Source: Coding guidelines
233-246: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
DevCommandPermissions::default()让拒绝路径依赖真实环境变量。
Default走from_connection_mode(None)，会读取进程的BONG_OPERATORS和BONG_OPERATORS_ALLOW_OFFLINE。该单元测试不隔离环境变量。若运行环境中BONG_OPERATORS恰好包含Alice，slash_season_command_rejected_for_non_op_player就不再测试拒绝路径。集成测试
server/tests/dev_command_operator_gate.rs用ENV_MUTEX和ScopedEnvVars做了隔离，这里没有。建议在
server/src/cmd/dev/mod.rs增加一个不读环境变量的测试构造器，让拒绝意图显式化。♻️ 建议的确定性测试构造器
在
server/src/cmd/dev/mod.rs的impl DevCommandPermissions中新增：#[cfg(test)] pub fn deny_all() -> Self { Self { allowed_usernames: HashSet::new(), usernames_are_authenticated: true, } }然后在本文件中使用：
if allow_alice { app.insert_resource(DevCommandPermissions::allow_user("Alice")); } else { - app.insert_resource(DevCommandPermissions::default()); + app.insert_resource(DevCommandPermissions::deny_all()); }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@server/src/cmd/dev/season.rs` around lines 233 - 246, Make the rejection setup in setup_command_app deterministic by replacing the false branch’s DevCommandPermissions::default() with the test-only DevCommandPermissions::deny_all() constructor. Add deny_all to the DevCommandPermissions impl in mod.rs under cfg(test), initializing an empty allowed_usernames set with usernames_are_authenticated enabled, so the test does not read environment variables.
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md (3)
388-390: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win使用规定的 consume-plan 章节名称。
请将 §10 最后一节标题改为“单次 consume-plan 全自动到 merge”，并保持该节为 §10 的最后一节。
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md` around lines 388 - 390, 将 §10 的最后一节标题从“单次 consume-plan 收口”改为“单次 consume-plan 全自动到 merge”，保持该节内容不变，并确保它仍是 §10 的最后一节。Source: Coding guidelines
329-335: 🩺 Stability & Availability | 🟠 Major | 🏗️ Heavy lift为
pending补齐生命周期和溢出策略。当前表格只定义
dead_letter。Line 335 却要求pending也受独立上限约束。请增加
pendingpolicy row，至少定义max_items、max_bytes、单条max_payload_bytes、retention/TTL、cleanup owner 和满载策略。同步增加写入、恢复、过期清理和 overflow telemetry 测试。🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md` around lines 329 - 335, 在“backpressure 与优先级 [DECISION-NEEDED F09]”的 dead-letter policy table 中新增 pending policy row，明确有限的 max_items、max_bytes、max_payload_bytes、retention_ttl、cleanup owner 与满载策略，并确保该策略与 pending 的写入、恢复及过期清理流程一致；补充测试覆盖 pending 写入、恢复、TTL 清理和容量溢出，并验证 overflow telemetry 可查询且 pending 不超过各项上限。
372-382: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟠 Major | 🏗️ Heavy lift将提交身份和提交命令写成强制门禁。
model: "opus"不是精确模型 ID。当前文本也没有强制中文 commit、每个逻辑单元一个 atomic commit、每个 agent commit 的Model: <精确模型 id>trailer，以及禁止--no-verify、--no-gpg-sign、未经确认的 force push、hard reset、amend 和交互式 rebase。请把这些规则写入 §10.4。模型 ID 必须写入每个 agent 生成的 commit trailer，不能只写入 PR body。
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md` around lines 372 - 382, 在 §10.4 补充强制提交与提交命令门禁：要求使用中文 commit message、每个逻辑单元一个 atomic commit，并在每个 agent 生成的 commit trailer 中记录实际精确模型 ID（不要使用“opus”等占位名，也不能只记录在 PR body）。同时明确禁止使用 --no-verify、--no-gpg-sign、未经确认的 force push、hard reset、amend 及交互式 rebase，并保留现有执行模型、validator 和 reviewer 的真实模型 ID 记录要求。Source: Coding guidelines
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.github/review-policy/bong.v2.json:
- Line 133: Update the exact contract assertion for the p0-doc-scope policy in
.github/scripts/review-consumer.test.mjs to match the revised text at the policy
entry, preserving the existing assert.equal-based validation and all unrelated
expectations.
In `@docs/plan-refactor-inventory-core-v1.md`:
- Line 9: 为所有 scope ≥4 PR 的计划补齐或重排统一的“§10 实施工作流”：在
docs/plan-refactor-inventory-core-v1.md:9 为 R10
P0-P4、docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.md:23 为 R4
P0-P4、docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-cast-av-contract-v1.md:22-23 为 R9
P0-P4、docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-persistence-slices-v1.md:28-31 为 R3
P0-P5、docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-wire-s2c-v1.md:21-25 为 R6 P0-P5
添加前置依赖与串行 PR 顺序、每 PR 独立 subagent、测试和 review gate、atomic commit、中文 commit、精确
Model trailer 及禁止命令；在 docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-master-v1.md:44-80 重排
§10，同时保留 flash-review 清算职责。所有计划的最后一节标题必须是“单次 consume-plan 全自动到 merge”。
In `@docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-master-v1.md`:
- Around line 57-80: 统一跨轨 activation 顺序，避免 master 与子计划声明冲突的启动门：在
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-master-v1.md（57-80）确认并记录 R10 P2b
的完整前置，或明确仅保留现有 R6 P3 gate；随后同步
docs/plan-refactor-inventory-core-v1.md（90-98），删除未被 master 权威覆盖的 R5 P3、R10 P3、R4
pickup consumer 启动前置，确保所有子计划遵循 master 的 Wave/dependency 顺序。
In `@scripts/bot-e2e.sh`:
- Around line 26-43: Remove the independent hard-coded operator roster in
scripts/bot-e2e.sh lines 26-43 by deriving the complete list from the scenario
definitions, or assert after roster generation that every bot username used in
this run is covered. In scripts/e2e-redis.sh lines 1239-1249, eliminate the
hard-coded NRift suffix by consuming the scenario-produced bot username or the
same shared constant; preserve the existing run-tag flow at line 1311.
In `@server/src/cmd/dev/mod.rs`:
- Around line 244-263: 更新 gate_dev_commands 中的命令根解析逻辑，先去除前导空白和前导“/”再提取根命令，以确保
CommandExecutionEvent.command 中的“/qi”等形式能匹配
DevCommandRoots。保持该函数仅发送权限提示，不在此处消费事件或额外拒绝命令，继续沿用现有的 operator 校验与执行拦截流程。
In `@server/tests/dev_command_operator_gate.rs`:
- Around line 89-93: 补充 DevCommandPermissions::from_connection_mode 的专属测试，覆盖
ConnectionMode 的 BungeeCord 和 Velocity variant，并断言其授权结果符合 Online/Offline
的预期。调整或新增 setup_app 测试场景，使 NetworkSettings 缺失时传入 None，覆盖
from_connection_mode(None) 的 fail-open 分支并断言结果。保持现有 Online、Offline 用例不变，确保每个
ConnectionMode variant 及缺失配置路径都有测试。
- Around line 382-390: 将生产注册清单中的 identity 补入 registry_pin::COMMAND_NAMES 和
COMMAND_TREE_PATHS，使其与 IdentityCmd::assemble_graph 注册的根级命令一致；随后在生产命令树 pin 测试中移除
expected_roots.insert("identity") 硬编码补丁，并保留基于 COMMAND_NAMES 生成 expected_roots
的校验逻辑。
---
Outside diff comments:
In `@server/src/cmd/dev/season.rs`:
- Around line 130-147: 为 handle_season 增加覆盖 SeasonCmd::Query
的专属测试用例，验证查询返回当前状态消息，同时不修改 WorldSeasonState 且不发送 SeasonChangedEvent；保留现有 Set 和
Advance 测试，并遵循已有测试的断言与构造方式。
- Around line 233-246: Make the rejection setup in setup_command_app
deterministic by replacing the false branch’s DevCommandPermissions::default()
with the test-only DevCommandPermissions::deny_all() constructor. Add deny_all
to the DevCommandPermissions impl in mod.rs under cfg(test), initializing an
empty allowed_usernames set with usernames_are_authenticated enabled, so the
test does not read environment variables.
---
Duplicate comments:
In `@docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md`:
- Around line 388-390: 将 §10 的最后一节标题从“单次 consume-plan 收口”改为“单次 consume-plan 全自动到
merge”，保持该节内容不变，并确保它仍是 §10 的最后一节。
- Around line 329-335: 在“backpressure 与优先级 [DECISION-NEEDED F09]”的 dead-letter
policy table 中新增 pending policy row，明确有限的
max_items、max_bytes、max_payload_bytes、retention_ttl、cleanup owner 与满载策略，并确保该策略与
pending 的写入、恢复及过期清理流程一致；补充测试覆盖 pending 写入、恢复、TTL 清理和容量溢出，并验证 overflow telemetry
可查询且 pending 不超过各项上限。
- Around line 372-382: 在 §10.4 补充强制提交与提交命令门禁：要求使用中文 commit message、每个逻辑单元一个
atomic commit，并在每个 agent 生成的 commit trailer 中记录实际精确模型 ID（不要使用“opus”等占位名，也不能只记录在
PR body）。同时明确禁止使用 --no-verify、--no-gpg-sign、未经确认的 force push、hard reset、amend
及交互式 rebase，并保留现有执行模型、validator 和 reviewer 的真实模型 ID 记录要求。
🪄 Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 9f8f7062-3cd8-44bb-860d-2849d5b0b998
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
.github/review-policy/bong.v2.jsondocs/plan-refactor-inventory-core-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-cast-av-contract-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-master-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-persistence-slices-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-wire-s2c-v1.mdscripts/bot-e2e.shscripts/e2e-redis.shserver/src/cmd/dev/mod.rsserver/src/cmd/dev/season.rsserver/tests/dev_command_operator_gate.rs
📜 Review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (1)
- GitHub Check: e2e
⚠️ CI failures not shown inline (2)
GitHub Actions: Review consumer tests / test: skeleton: agent 叙事管道计划 v1（§10.1.1 促升）
Conclusion: failure
##[group]Run set -euo pipefail
�[36;1mset -euo pipefail�[0m
�[36;1m[[ "$(git -C _central-contract rev-parse HEAD)" == '2986b95388b3ac3f8bf28b8ebdd60a19d2e4364c' ]]�[0m
�[36;1m[[ "$(git -C 9dcee849e3a0b45bd9a8fe663b48ae3fb1d82784 rev-parse HEAD)" == '9dcee849e3a0b45bd9a8fe663b48ae3fb1d82784' ]]�[0m
�[36;1mnode --check .github/scripts/review-consumer.test.mjs�[0m
�[36;1mCENTRAL_REVIEW_CONTRACT_DIR=_central-contract \�[0m
�[36;1m PROVIDER_CANARY_CONTRACT_DIR=9dcee849e3a0b45bd9a8fe663b48ae3fb1d82784 \�[0m
�[36;1m node --test .github/scripts/review-consumer.test.mjs�[0m
�[36;1m(�[0m
�[36;1m cd _central-contract�[0m
�[36;1m npm test�[0m
�[36;1m)�[0m
�[36;1mgit diff --check�[0m
shell: /usr/bin/bash --noprofile --norc -e -o pipefail {0}
env:
BWRAP_EXECUTABLE: /home/runner/work/Bong/Bong/_sandbox-package/root/usr/bin/bwrap
##[endgroup]
✔ shadow caller pins the central workflow and preserves the trusted trigger gate (5.809278ms)
✔ shadow caller job exactly matches the reviewed reusable contract (1.430291ms)
✔ consumer CI checks out and tests the exact central workflow contract (0.879811ms)
✔ checked-out central workflow matches the complete immutable publication contract (2.736814ms)
✔ central publication contract rejects every input and secret set drift (3.237405ms)
✔ caller publication contract rejects mapping, secret, and permission drift (1.604421ms)
✔ central permission contract rejects unbound and non-block permission forms (1.549429ms)
✔ checked-out provider canary release matches its caller interface (1.760644ms)
✔ provider canary publication contract rejects every input and secret set drift (1.420236ms)
✔ provider canary remains dispatch-only, minimally permissioned, and secret-isolated (2.388429ms)
✖ Bong policy is bounded declarative data with canonical project rules (2.230745ms)
ℹ tests 11
ℹ suites 0
ℹ pass 10
ℹ fail 1
ℹ cancelled 0
ℹ skipped 0
ℹ todo 0
ℹ duration_ms 84.962885
✖ failing tests:
test at .github/scripts/r...
GitHub Actions: Review consumer tests / 0_test.txt: skeleton: agent 叙事管道计划 v1（§10.1.1 促升）
Conclusion: failure
##[group]Run set -euo pipefail
�[36;1mset -euo pipefail�[0m
�[36;1m[[ "$(git -C _central-contract rev-parse HEAD)" == '2986b95388b3ac3f8bf28b8ebdd60a19d2e4364c' ]]�[0m
�[36;1m[[ "$(git -C 9dcee849e3a0b45bd9a8fe663b48ae3fb1d82784 rev-parse HEAD)" == '9dcee849e3a0b45bd9a8fe663b48ae3fb1d82784' ]]�[0m
�[36;1mnode --check .github/scripts/review-consumer.test.mjs�[0m
�[36;1mCENTRAL_REVIEW_CONTRACT_DIR=_central-contract \�[0m
�[36;1m PROVIDER_CANARY_CONTRACT_DIR=9dcee849e3a0b45bd9a8fe663b48ae3fb1d82784 \�[0m
�[36;1m node --test .github/scripts/review-consumer.test.mjs�[0m
�[36;1m(�[0m
�[36;1m cd _central-contract�[0m
�[36;1m npm test�[0m
�[36;1m)�[0m
�[36;1mgit diff --check�[0m
shell: /usr/bin/bash --noprofile --norc -e -o pipefail {0}
env:
BWRAP_EXECUTABLE: /home/runner/work/Bong/Bong/_sandbox-package/root/usr/bin/bwrap
##[endgroup]
✔ shadow caller pins the central workflow and preserves the trusted trigger gate (5.809278ms)
✔ shadow caller job exactly matches the reviewed reusable contract (1.430291ms)
✔ consumer CI checks out and tests the exact central workflow contract (0.879811ms)
✔ checked-out central workflow matches the complete immutable publication contract (2.736814ms)
✔ central publication contract rejects every input and secret set drift (3.237405ms)
✔ caller publication contract rejects mapping, secret, and permission drift (1.604421ms)
✔ central permission contract rejects unbound and non-block permission forms (1.549429ms)
✔ checked-out provider canary release matches its caller interface (1.760644ms)
✔ provider canary publication contract rejects every input and secret set drift (1.420236ms)
✔ provider canary remains dispatch-only, minimally permissioned, and secret-isolated (2.388429ms)
✖ Bong policy is bounded declarative data with canonical project rules (2.230745ms)
ℹ tests 11
ℹ suites 0
ℹ pass 10
ℹ fail 1
ℹ cancelled 0
ℹ skipped 0
ℹ todo 0
ℹ duration_ms 84.962885
✖ failing tests:
test at .github/scripts/r...
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
**/*
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
**/*: commit message 必须使用中文，每个逻辑单元一个 atomic commit；agent 生成的 commit 必须带真实模型Model: <精确模型 id>trailer。
禁止使用--no-verify、--no-gpg-sign、关闭签名配置、未经确认的 force push、hard reset、amend 或交互式 rebase。
禁止留下 auto-stash 产生的孤儿 WIP stash；自动 stash 流程完成后必须恢复自己的 stash。
Files:
scripts/bot-e2e.shdocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-persistence-slices-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-master-v1.mddocs/plan-refactor-inventory-core-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-cast-av-contract-v1.mdscripts/e2e-redis.shserver/tests/dev_command_operator_gate.rsdocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-wire-s2c-v1.mdserver/src/cmd/dev/mod.rsdocs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.mdserver/src/cmd/dev/season.rs
docs/**/*.md
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (docs/CLAUDE.md)
docs/**/*.md: 新 plan 头部必须写明接入面：进料、出料、复用的共享类型/event/schema、server/agent/client 跨仓库契约，以及对应的worldview.md锚点。
涉及真元、灵气、衰减、逸散、半衰、距离损耗、排斥或吸力的 plan，必须调用qi_physics；新物理常数和公式必须先扩展qi_physics，不得在功能 plan 中重复实现。
所有真元/灵气流动必须遵守守恒律并通过qi_physics::ledger::QiTransfer；释放使用qi_release_to_zone，吸收使用qi_excretion，不得凭空生成或销毁真元。
涉及玩家可感知行为的 plan，必须在对应机制阶段中内联可直接实现的粒子、音效、HUD、环境、动画和 narration 规格；不得将视听内容笼统推迟到独立阶段。纯 server 逻辑 plan 例外。
每份 plan 必须列出开放问题；实施前必须追加§N.1 决议，逐项给出结论、实施方案、边界条件，并以文件:行号和 plan 章节双锚点落地。
scope 大于或等于 4 个 PR 的 plan，必须在末尾包含§10 实施工作流，并按依赖顺序在一个 plan 内序列化多个 PR，不得拆成多个 plan。
涉及 NBT 建筑、worldgen layout 或复杂视觉资产的 TODO，必须完成三轮提交：(round 1/3)、(round 2/3)、(round 3/3)；终轮提交必须包含拼写准确的<PROMISE>担保块。
§10 最末必须包含“单次 consume-plan 全自动到 merge”章节，明确用户提交/consume-plan后即可等待最终归档至docs/finished_plans/。引用世界观内容时统一使用
worldview.md §X L<line>格式；不得自动修改docs/worldview.md或主动回写docs/library/。
Files:
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-persistence-slices-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-master-v1.mddocs/plan-refactor-inventory-core-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-cast-av-contract-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-wire-s2c-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md
docs/plans-skeleton/**/*.md
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
新 plan 必须先读取
docs/CLAUDE.md；骨架、Active 和 Finished plan 必须遵循三态流转及规定的阶段状态、Finish Evidence 结构。
Files:
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-persistence-slices-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-master-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-cast-av-contract-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-wire-s2c-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md
server/**/*.rs
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
server/**/*.rs: 所有真元/灵气流动必须通过qi_physics::ledger::QiTransfer；不得直接修改玩家或区域真元，必须保持SPIRIT_QI_TOTAL守恒。
不得自行定义真元衰减、抽取或半衰期常数；必须复用或先扩展qi_physics::constants。
离屏战死必须调用release_dormant_qi_to_zone并通过ledger.transfer(ReleaseToZone)返还真元；不得直接删除带有真元的快照。
使用境界名称醒灵 → 引气 → 凝脉 → 固元 → 通灵 → 化虚，严禁使用旧称练气、筑基、金丹、元婴。
新 zone 必须先核对docs/worldview.md区域表和server/zones.json中的既有 ID。
禁止使用 armor stand 或 invisible mob 作为碰撞箱或交互载体；实体必须采用 Marker + 自定义渲染，交互通过 C2S 请求处理。
Files:
server/tests/dev_command_operator_gate.rsserver/src/cmd/dev/mod.rsserver/src/cmd/dev/season.rs
**/*.{rs,ts,tsx,java,py}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
**/*.{rs,ts,tsx,java,py}: 每个新增函数、组件或协议必须测试 happy path、边界、错误分支和全部状态转换；测试应断言外部可观察行为而非内部实现。
schema、enum 和状态机必须有专属 pin 测试；TypeBox/serde variant 要有正反 sample 对拍，每个 enum variant 和状态转换至少有一条用例。
Files:
server/tests/dev_command_operator_gate.rsserver/src/cmd/dev/mod.rsserver/src/cmd/dev/season.rs
🧠 Learnings (3)
📚 Learning: 2026-07-17T00:31:10.779Z
Learnt from: Kizunad
Repo: Kizunad/Bong PR: 1218
File: docs/plans-skeleton/plan-skill-av-relink-v1.md:1-1
Timestamp: 2026-07-17T00:31:10.779Z
Learning: 在审查该仓库 `docs/plans-skeleton/` 下的“docs-only skeleton plan”创建类 PR 时：先核对 `docs/CLAUDE.md` 中“Plan 消费规范”，并逐份查看本计划文档里的“§10 实施工作流”，确认后续实施阶段是否会遵循“每个 PR 只修改一个 plan”，且实施/归档时不会出现跨 plan 的修改。该规则不适用于用户显式指定、共享调研基线且计划之间存在互相交叉引用的 skeleton plan 同批创建 PR；对这类情况应按实际交叉引用关系放宽，确保仍能按独立或约定的序列化方式推进。
Applied to files:
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-persistence-slices-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-master-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-cast-av-contract-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-wire-s2c-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md
📚 Learning: 2026-07-17T00:31:13.643Z
Learnt from: Kizunad
Repo: Kizunad/Bong PR: 1218
File: docs/plans-skeleton/plan-skill-av-relink-v1.md:81-85
Timestamp: 2026-07-17T00:31:13.643Z
Learning: 审核 docs/plans-skeleton/*.md 下的 skeleton 草案 PR 时：不得要求作者在“§N 开放问题（P0 决策门前需收口）”核查完成之前提前填写对应的“§N.1 决议”。仅当计划进入 active 且 P0 实施前，已由 Explore agent 并行核查代码现状后，才允许追加“§N.1 决议”，且该决议需包含结论、实施方案、边界条件，并使用“文件:行号 + plan 章节”的双锚点格式。
Applied to files:
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-persistence-slices-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-master-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-cast-av-contract-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-wire-s2c-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md
📚 Learning: 2026-07-22T02:11:59.191Z
Learnt from: Kizunad
Repo: Kizunad/Bong PR: 1247
File: docs/plans-skeleton/plan-bughunt-animal-air-spawn-gravity-v1.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2026-07-22T02:11:59.191Z
Learning: 在 `docs/plans-skeleton/` 目录下的计划状态行中，若起草日期同时涉及 UTC 与本地日期（例如时区换算后可能跨到不同日期），请在该行中同时标注 UTC 起草日与本地起草日。这样可以避免基于 UTC 的时间基准在 GitHub/CodeRabbit 审查时将本地日期误判为“未来日期”。
Applied to files:
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-persistence-slices-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-master-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-cast-av-contract-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-wire-s2c-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md
[grammar] ~129-~129: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...ce issue 清单与唯一聚类 ### 4.1 publish-error-boundary（5 个 source ID；其中 4 个为 #1470 重复证据） `#1470...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
[grammar] ~141-~141: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ... P4 raw-ID 修复范围。 ### 4.3 agent-publish-idempotency（8 个 confirmed source ID） #1616 #1619 #1`...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
[grammar] ~190-~190: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...batch/event id，但这不等于当前 Pub/Sub receiver 已实现可见副作用去重。 2. 以 ordering_key 对同一 player/entity/z...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
[grammar] ~191-~191: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...yer/entity/zone 的事件串行化；不同 key 可 bounded 并发，设置全局并发上限和队列上限。 3. 将 feature cooldown、lastStatusByFaction、...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
[grammar] ~309-~309: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...follow-up 由各自 owner 提供独立证据。 ## 8. Open questions（P0 内收口；P0 退出前冻结依赖决策） 本节不构成 P0 entry block...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md (1)
3-50: LGTM!Also applies to: 61-308, 340-368
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-cast-av-contract-v1.md (1)
15-19: LGTM!Also applies to: 38-38
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-master-v1.md (1)
9-10: LGTM!Also applies to: 99-99
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-persistence-slices-v1.md (1)
59-59: LGTM!docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-wire-s2c-v1.md (1)
17-18: LGTM!Also applies to: 38-40
scripts/bot-e2e.sh (1)
316-317: LGTM!server/src/cmd/dev/mod.rs (4)
116-127: LGTM!
78-101: 🔒 Security & Privacy | 🔴 Critical | 🏗️ Heavy liftAuthorization Bypass (CWE-1188): Insecure Default Initialization of Resource
NetworkSettings缺失时授权 fail-open，需确认注册顺序。第 81 行只在
Some(ConnectionMode::Offline)时收紧信任。若connection_mode为None，usernames_are_authenticated变为true。
None的来源是第 183-187 行：register_operator_gate在dev::register(app)执行的那一刻读取NetworkSettings。Bevy 插件注册有顺序性。若生产App在dev::register之后才插入NetworkSettings（例如网络插件后置），则即使服务器实际运行在 Offline 模式，客户端自报用户名也会被当作已认证身份。结合第 96 行的默认 roster
{"Admin", "admin"}，后果是：任何人以用户名Admin连接 Offline 服务器即可获得bong.dev作用域，并执行/gm、/give、/qi、/realm等全部开发命令。集成测试
setup_app（server/tests/dev_command_operator_gate.rs第 72-78 行）先插入NetworkSettings再调用dev::register，因此该测试无法覆盖这条路径。建议两项修复：把
None视为不可信（fail-closed），并把连接模式读取推迟到Startup/PostStartup阶段。🔒️ 建议的 fail-closed 修正
fn from_connection_mode(connection_mode: Option<&ConnectionMode>) -> Self { let allow_offline = truthy_env_var("BONG_OPERATORS_ALLOW_OFFLINE"); - let usernames_are_authenticated = - !matches!(connection_mode, Some(ConnectionMode::Offline)) || allow_offline; - if matches!(connection_mode, Some(ConnectionMode::Offline)) && !allow_offline { + // 未知连接模式必须按不可信处理。 + let mode_authenticates = matches!( + connection_mode, + Some(ConnectionMode::Online { .. }) | Some(ConnectionMode::BungeeCord) | Some(ConnectionMode::Velocity { .. }) + ); + let usernames_are_authenticated = mode_authenticates || allow_offline; + if !mode_authenticates && !allow_offline { tracing::warn!( - "BONG_OPERATORS ignored in offline mode; set BONG_OPERATORS_ALLOW_OFFLINE=1 to explicitly trust client-provided usernames" + ?connection_mode, + "BONG_OPERATORS ignored: connection mode does not authenticate usernames; set BONG_OPERATORS_ALLOW_OFFLINE=1 to explicitly trust client-provided usernames" ); }#!/bin/bash # 目的：确认生产 App 中 NetworkSettings 与 dev::register 的注册顺序。 set -uo pipefail echo "=== NetworkSettings 插入点 ===" rg -n -C10 'NetworkSettings' server/src --glob '!**/tests/**' echo "=== dev::register 调用点 ===" rg -n -C10 'dev::register|cmd::register|cmd::dev::register' server/src echo "=== main / app 构建 ===" fd -e rs 'main.rs|lib.rs' server/src --max-depth 2 --exec ast-grep outline {} --items all
199-229: 🔒 Security & Privacy | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick winAuthorization Bypass (CWE-862): Missing Authorization
Reachability: Internal
一次性初始化对后续新增命令根 fail-open。
Local<bool>让该系统只在第一个EventLoopPreUpdate帧扫描一次命令图。任何在该帧之后进入CommandRegistry的命令根不会被打上bong.dev作用域，因此对所有玩家可见且可达。同时第 225 行用
vec![DEV_COMMAND_SCOPE]覆盖节点已有的scopes。若某个命令自行声明了更严格的作用域，该声明会被静默丢弃。建议改为追加去重，保留原有声明。请确认本仓库中没有在 App 构建期之后调用
AddCommand的路径。♻️ 建议：作用域追加而非覆盖
dev_roots.0.insert(name.clone()); - command_registry.graph.graph[node].scopes = vec![DEV_COMMAND_SCOPE.to_string()]; + let scopes = &mut command_registry.graph.graph[node].scopes; + if !scopes.iter().any(|scope| scope == DEV_COMMAND_SCOPE) { + scopes.push(DEV_COMMAND_SCOPE.to_string()); + }#!/bin/bash # 目的：查找构建期之后的命令注册路径与既有 scope 声明。 set -uo pipefail echo "=== add_command 调用点 ===" rg -n -C4 '\.add_command::<' server/src echo "=== 既有 scope 声明 ===" rg -n -C4 'scopes\s*=|#\[scopes' server/src
231-242: 🩺 Stability & Availability无需修改。
CommandScopes的现有生成路径与Username同帧存在，Added<CommandScopes>不会在该代码路径中产生后续遗漏。server/tests/dev_command_operator_gate.rs (2)
442-484: LGTM!
34-68: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality不需要修改：当前 crate 使用 Rust 2021 edition。
server/Cargo.toml声明edition = "2021"，因此std::env::set_var和std::env::remove_var不需要unsafe；该变更仅在 2024 edition 生效。
| "id": "p0-doc-scope", | ||
| "level": "major", | ||
| "text": "For pull requests whose changes are limited to docs/ plan documents (plan-* and plans-skeleton design-closure PRs), limit review scope to internal consistency, factual accuracy of code citations, alignment with plan-refactor-master-v1 scope and cross-track dependencies, and satisfaction of the acceptance criteria stated in the PR description or the document itself. Depth expansions beyond those criteria - new scenarios, extra edge-case enumerations, additional contract surfaces - are suggestions for the open-questions section, not major or blocker findings; an explicit open-questions entry with rationale is a valid resolution for a deferred design decision." | ||
| "text": "For pull requests whose changes are limited to docs/ plan documents (plan-* and plans-skeleton design-closure PRs), limit review scope to internal consistency, factual accuracy of code citations, alignment with plan-refactor-master-v1 scope and adjudications, cross-track dependencies, and satisfaction of the acceptance criteria stated in the PR description or the document itself. Findings addressed in a prior review round of the same branch, regardless of the pull-request number carrying that branch, must not be re-raised as major findings unless a later change newly contradicts or invalidates the resolution. Completeness expansions beyond the plan's stated acceptance criteria and evidence base - including demands for new scenarios, additional test rows, extra edge-case enumerations, protocol corners, or contract surfaces - are suggestions for the open-questions section, not major or blocker findings; an explicit open-questions entry with rationale is a valid resolution for a deferred design decision. Major findings in this scope are reserved for internal contradictions, conflicts with plan-refactor-master-v1 or binding adjudications, and specifications that a competent implementer could not execute as written." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
先同步更新 p0-doc-scope 的精确契约测试。
Line 133 修改了策略文本，但 .github/scripts/review-consumer.test.mjs 仍使用 assert.equal 校验旧文本。当前变更会导致该测试确定性失败。若新文本是预期行为，请在同一变更中更新测试期望值；否则请恢复旧文本。
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In @.github/review-policy/bong.v2.json at line 133, Update the exact contract
assertion for the p0-doc-scope policy in
.github/scripts/review-consumer.test.mjs to match the revised text at the policy
entry, preserving the existing assert.equal-based validation and all unrelated
expectations.
| - ✅ 2026-08-03 P0 完整契约面重写 + absorption audit | ||
| - ⬜ P1：inventory 拆分 + txn/capacity 骨架 + inventory-layout/dropped-loot 纯 migration helpers（依赖 R3 P1 seam） | ||
| - ⬜ P2：production writer 迁移分为 P2a metadata/provider + Public writer path 与 P2b OwnerOnly private-writer activation；P2a 依赖 R3 P2 atomic commit seam 与旧 dropped-loot compatibility，P2b 必须等 R3 P4 dropped-loot migration/hydration、R6 P1 recipient projection/page、R5 P3 + R6 P4、R10 P3 pickup txn 及 R4 pickup consumer 全部完成后才可启用。 | ||
| - ⬜ P2：production writer 迁移分为 P2a metadata/provider + Public writer path 与 P2b OwnerOnly private-writer activation；P2a 依赖 R3 P2 atomic commit seam 与旧 dropped-loot compatibility，P2b 必须等 R3 P4 dropped-loot migration/hydration、R6 P3 recipient projection/page production activation、R5 P3 + R6 P4、R10 P3 pickup txn 及 R4 pickup consumer 全部完成后才可启用。 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟠 Major | 🏗️ Heavy lift
为所有 scope ≥ 4 PR 的计划补齐 §10 实施工作流。
这些计划都定义了至少 4 个实施阶段，但没有在计划末尾提供统一的 §10 实施工作流。Master plan 的 §5 工作流 和 §10 flash-review issue 消化流程 不能替代规定的实施工作流。
请在每份计划末尾补齐：
-
前置依赖和串行 PR 顺序；
-
每 PR 的独立 subagent、测试和 review gate；
-
atomic commit、中文 commit、精确
Modeltrailer 和禁止命令； -
最后一节标题“单次 consume-plan 全自动到 merge”。
-
docs/plan-refactor-inventory-core-v1.md#L9-L9：为 R10 P0-P4 补充 §10。 -
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.md#L23-L23：为 R4 P0-P4 补充 §10。 -
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-cast-av-contract-v1.md#L22-L23：为 R9 P0-P4 补充 §10。 -
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-master-v1.md#L44-L80：为总纲重排 §10，保留 flash-review 清算职责。 -
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-persistence-slices-v1.md#L28-L31：为 R3 P0-P5 补充 §10。 -
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-wire-s2c-v1.md#L21-L25：为 R6 P0-P5 补充 §10。
As per coding guidelines：scope 大于或等于 4 个 PR 的 plan 必须包含 §10 实施工作流，并以“单次 consume-plan 全自动到 merge”收尾。
📍 Affects 6 files
docs/plan-refactor-inventory-core-v1.md#L9-L9(this comment)docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.md#L23-L23docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-cast-av-contract-v1.md#L22-L23docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-master-v1.md#L44-L80docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-persistence-slices-v1.md#L28-L31docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-wire-s2c-v1.md#L21-L25
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@docs/plan-refactor-inventory-core-v1.md` at line 9, 为所有 scope ≥4 PR
的计划补齐或重排统一的“§10 实施工作流”：在 docs/plan-refactor-inventory-core-v1.md:9 为 R10
P0-P4、docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.md:23 为 R4
P0-P4、docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-cast-av-contract-v1.md:22-23 为 R9
P0-P4、docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-persistence-slices-v1.md:28-31 为 R3
P0-P5、docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-wire-s2c-v1.md:21-25 为 R6 P0-P5
添加前置依赖与串行 PR 顺序、每 PR 独立 subagent、测试和 review gate、atomic commit、中文 commit、精确
Model trailer 及禁止命令；在 docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-master-v1.md:44-80 重排
§10，同时保留 flash-review 清算职责。所有计划的最后一节标题必须是“单次 consume-plan 全自动到 merge”。
Source: Coding guidelines
| BOT_E2E_OPERATOR_TAGS=( | ||
| RGA RGB Clr Fog Give Atk RespawnSfx Cast SwordAV Sword Break Pill Cult Box Herbal Eqp ScDim | ||
| MCA MCB CE1 CE2 Req Scope Tol AmbSur Brew ProdAF Refund Resume Forge Craft ProdLG WoodDrop J1 Poi | ||
| ) | ||
| BOT_E2E_OPERATORS="" | ||
| for bot_tag in "${BOT_E2E_OPERATOR_TAGS[@]}"; do | ||
| [ -z "$BOT_E2E_OPERATORS" ] || BOT_E2E_OPERATORS+=, | ||
| BOT_E2E_OPERATORS+="B${BOT_E2E_RUN_TAG}${bot_tag}" | ||
| done | ||
| # Reuse is safe only when the caller proves that the running offline server has this exact | ||
| # run-tag roster and the explicit username-trust opt-in. Otherwise force the fresh-launch path. | ||
| if [ "$REUSE" = "1" ] && [ "$AMBIENT_FIXTURE_MODE" != "1" ] && { | ||
| [ "${BONG_OPERATORS:-}" != "$BOT_E2E_OPERATORS" ] || | ||
| [ "${BONG_OPERATORS_ALLOW_OFFLINE:-}" != "1" ] | ||
| }; then | ||
| echo "[bot-e2e] existing server operator roster does not match this run; disabling BOT_E2E_REUSE=1" >&2 | ||
| REUSE=0 | ||
| fi |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
operator 用户名缺少单一事实来源。 两个脚本都在 shell 侧手工构造 operator 用户名，而实际 bot 用户名由 scripts/bot/run_scenarios.py 的场景定义独立构造。两侧没有共享来源，也没有一致性断言。任一侧改名或新增场景 bot，roster 就会漏掉该 bot，dev 命令被新的 operator 门控拒绝，故障表现只是场景断言失败，难以定位。
scripts/bot-e2e.sh#L26-L43：BOT_E2E_OPERATOR_TAGS硬编码 34 个后缀。请从场景定义导出该列表，或在生成 roster 后断言它覆盖本轮将要连接的全部 bot 用户名。scripts/e2e-redis.sh#L1239-L1249：NRift后缀在此处硬编码，而第 1311 行只把NORTH_RIFT_RUN_TAG传给场景。请让场景侧输出其 bot 用户名，或在脚本中复用同一常量定义。
📍 Affects 2 files
scripts/bot-e2e.sh#L26-L43(this comment)scripts/e2e-redis.sh#L1239-L1249
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@scripts/bot-e2e.sh` around lines 26 - 43, Remove the independent hard-coded
operator roster in scripts/bot-e2e.sh lines 26-43 by deriving the complete list
from the scenario definitions, or assert after roster generation that every bot
username used in this run is covered. In scripts/e2e-redis.sh lines 1239-1249,
eliminate the hard-coded NRift suffix by consuming the scenario-produced bot
username or the same shared constant; preserve the existing run-tag flow at line
1311.
| fn gate_dev_commands( | ||
| mut events: EventReader<CommandExecutionEvent>, | ||
| dev_roots: Res<DevCommandRoots>, | ||
| permissions: Res<DevCommandPermissions>, | ||
| usernames: Query<&Username>, | ||
| mut clients: Query<&mut Client>, | ||
| ) { | ||
| for event in events.read() { | ||
| let command_root = event.command.split_whitespace().next().unwrap_or_default(); | ||
| if !dev_roots.0.contains(command_root) | ||
| || usernames | ||
| .get(event.executor) | ||
| .is_ok_and(|username| permissions.is_operator(username.0.as_str())) | ||
| { | ||
| continue; | ||
| } | ||
| if let Ok(mut client) = clients.get_mut(event.executor) { | ||
| client.send_chat_message("[dev] Command requires operator permission."); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# 目的：确认 CommandExecutionEvent.command 是否包含前导斜杠。
set -uo pipefail
fd -t f 'manager.rs' -p 'command' --exec rg -n -C10 'CommandExecutionEvent' {}
rg -n -C10 'CommandExecutionEvent\s*\{' ~/.cargo/registry 2>/dev/null | head -60
rg -n -C6 'ChatCommandC2s' server/srcRepository: Kizunad/Bong
Length of output: 245
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# 定位且检查与 dev 命令 gate、CommandExecutionEvent、相关测试的源代码上下文。
set -euo pipefail
echo "== files containing dev/mod.rs =="
fd -t f 'mod.rs' server/src/cmd/dev 2>/dev/null || true
echo "== repository occurrences of gate_dev_commands/event.command/CommandExecutionEvent =="
rg -n -C 5 'gate_dev_commands|CommandExecutionEvent|is_operator|dev_roots|CommandExecutionEvent\s*\{' server -g '*.rs' || true
echo "== relevant dev/mod.rs sections =="
if [ -f server/src/cmd/dev/mod.rs ]; then
wc -l server/src/cmd/dev/mod.rs
sed -n '220,280p' server/src/cmd/dev/mod.rs
sed -n '1,180p' server/src/cmd/dev/mod.rs
fi
echo "== command execution test command snippets =="
sed -n '100,150p' server/src/cmd/dev/mod.rs || trueRepository: Kizunad/Bong
Length of output: 19291
🌐 Web query:
valence-rs CommandExecutionEvent command field manager command execution source
💡 Result:
Based on an examination of the Valence Rust framework (valence-rs) codebase, documentation, and public APIs, there is no entity or event named CommandExecutionEvent that contains fields like command, manager, or command execution source [1][2][3][4][5][6]. The valence-rs project utilizes Bevy ECS for event handling [1][7]. While it defines various events related to player and client actions (such as SneakEvent, DiggingEvent, InteractEntityEvent, and JumpWithHorseEvent) [2][3], the framework does not currently implement a generalized CommandExecutionEvent with the specified structure [2][3]. It is highly likely that the term CommandExecutionEvent is being conflated with other technologies: - A CommandExecutionEvent interface exists in the Microsoft VS Code API (for monitoring command execution) [8]. - An CommandExecutionEvent class exists within the AWS IoT Device SDK for Java [9]. - A custom CommandExecutionEvent class is documented in unrelated projects such as the Panther Project's execution environment [10]. If you are working with Valence, you may be looking for how to handle chat commands or protocol-level interactions, which are typically managed through different mechanisms in the framework [1][4][11].
Citations:
- 1: https://github.com/valence-rs/valence/
- 2: https://tangled.org/avikav.net/valence/blob/26d082c8c95780e9fa151dcc8fe95331cc5e9bcd/src/lib.rs
- 3: https://tangled.org/avikav.net/valence/blob/5c458ee4c40e45fc52f5c770dc2e68a26a09c944/src/lib.rs
- 4: https://docs.rs/valence/latest/valence/index.html
- 5: https://docs.rs/valence/
- 6: https://docs.rs/valence/latest/valence/server/index.html
- 7: https://github.com/valence-rs/valence/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md
- 8: https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-docs/blob/vnext/release-notes/v1_37.md
- 9: https://aws.github.io/aws-iot-device-sdk-java-v2/index-all.html
- 10: https://elniak.github.io/PANTHER/execution_environment.html
- 11: https://crates.io/crates/valence
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查 Cargo.lock / Cargo.toml 里的 valence 版本，并结合 crate metadata 解析 CommandExecutionEvent.command 的真实来源。
set -euo pipefail
echo "== valence versions in cargo manifests =="
for f in Cargo.toml server/Cargo.toml; do
[ -f "$f" ] && { echo "--- $f"; rg -n 'valence|command' "$f" || true; }
done
echo "== lockfile valence entries =="
if [ -f Cargo.lock ]; then
rg -n -C 3 'name = "valence"|name = "valence-|version = ' Cargo.lock | rg -C 3 'name = "valence' || true
fi
echo "== local Cargo registry src for CommandExecutionEvent =="
python3 - <<'PY'
from pathlib import Path
import re
for root in [Path.home()/'.cargo/registry/src']:
if not root.exists():
continue
for p in root.rglob('*.rs'):
text=p.read_text(errors='ignore')
if 'CommandExecutionEvent' in text:
print(f'--- {p}')
idx=text.find('pub struct CommandExecutionEvent')
if idx==-1: idx=text.find('struct CommandExecutionEvent')
if idx==-1: idx=text.find('enum CommandExecutionEvent')
if idx!=-1:
end=text.find('\n}', idx)
print(text[idx:end+2])
else:
print(text[text.find('CommandExecutionEvent'):text.find('CommandExecutionEvent')+800])
PY
echo "== source test non-operator command with leading slash if any =="
sed -n '430,485p' server/tests/dev_command_operator_gate.rs || true
echo "== deterministic matching behavior for gate extract =="
python3 - <<'PY'
samples = ["qi set 40", "/qi set 40", " qi set ", " qi set 40", ""]
dev_roots = {"qi"}
for command in samples:
root = command.split(None, 1)[0].split()[0] if command.split() else ""
# Rust split_whitespace().next() is equivalent for these sample strings
print(f'{command!r} -> {root!r} included={root in dev_roots}')
PYRepository: Kizunad/Bong
Length of output: 3192
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# 通过 git 源直接读取 valence 2b705351 中的 CommandExecutionEvent.command，避免本地本地 registry 缺失或版本问题。
set -euo pipefail
tmp="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmp"' EXIT
git clone --depth 1 --branch main --single-branch "https://github.com/valence-rs/valence" "$tmp/valence" >/dev/null || true
cd "$tmp/valence"
git checkout "2b705351" >/dev/null || true
echo "== Checkout status =="
git status --short
git rev-parse HEAD
echo "== Find and inspect CommandExecutionEvent in source =="
rg -n -C 15 'pub struct CommandExecutionEvent|struct CommandExecutionEvent|CommandExecutionEvent' . || trueRepository: Kizunad/Bong
Length of output: 12493
用 command 与校验逻辑解耦并处理前导斜杠
-
gate_dev_commands只发提示，不负责消费或拒绝执行；当前非 operator 执行仍由valence_command的 scope 检查拦截。若要把授权判定整合到同一处失败分支，需要在读取CommandExecutionEvent后直接消费或设置拒绝标记。 -
客户端命令通过
CommandExecutionC2s.command进入CommandExecutionEvent.command，可能包含前导/。当前split_whitespace().next()会把/qi识别为根名，导致dev_roots匹配失败；应剥离前导空白和前导/后再取根名。
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@server/src/cmd/dev/mod.rs` around lines 244 - 263, 更新 gate_dev_commands
中的命令根解析逻辑，先去除前导空白和前导“/”再提取根命令，以确保 CommandExecutionEvent.command 中的“/qi”等形式能匹配
DevCommandRoots。保持该函数仅发送权限提示，不在此处消费事件或额外拒绝命令，继续沿用现有的 operator 校验与执行拦截流程。
| fn online_mode() -> ConnectionMode { | ||
| ConnectionMode::Online { | ||
| prevent_proxy_connections: true, | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
测试未覆盖 ConnectionMode 的全部 variant，也未覆盖 NetworkSettings 缺失场景。
DevCommandPermissions::from_connection_mode 对 ConnectionMode 做匹配判定。当前测试只覆盖 Online 和 Offline。BungeeCord 和 Velocity 这两个 variant 没有用例，而它们同样不由服务器自身认证用户名，判定结果直接影响授权。
同时，setup_app 总是先插入 NetworkSettings，因此 from_connection_mode(None) 这条分支完全没有测试。这正是 server/src/cmd/dev/mod.rs 第 81 行 fail-open 的路径。
请补齐这两类用例。
依据编码规范：“schema、enum 和状态机必须有专属 pin 测试；……每个 enum variant 和状态转换至少有一条用例。”
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@server/tests/dev_command_operator_gate.rs` around lines 89 - 93, 补充
DevCommandPermissions::from_connection_mode 的专属测试，覆盖 ConnectionMode 的 BungeeCord
和 Velocity variant，并断言其授权结果符合 Online/Offline 的预期。调整或新增 setup_app 测试场景，使
NetworkSettings 缺失时传入 None，覆盖 from_connection_mode(None) 的 fail-open
分支并断言结果。保持现有 Online、Offline 用例不变，确保每个 ConnectionMode variant 及缺失配置路径都有测试。
Source: Coding guidelines
| let mut expected_roots = registry_pin::COMMAND_NAMES | ||
| .iter() | ||
| .copied() | ||
| .collect::<BTreeSet<_>>(); | ||
| expected_roots.insert("identity"); | ||
| assert_eq!( | ||
| actual_roots, expected_roots, | ||
| "gate test must cover every root-level literal registered in production" | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# 目的：核对 registry_pin::COMMAND_NAMES 是否遗漏 identity。
set -uo pipefail
rg -n -C20 'COMMAND_NAMES' server/src/cmd/registry_pin.rs
rg -n -C4 'IdentityCmd' server/srcRepository: Kizunad/Bong
Length of output: 24231
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -uo pipefail
echo "== candidate files =="
fd -a 'dev_command_operator_gate\.rs|registry_pin\.rs|identity/command\.rs' server/src server/tests
echo
echo "== gate test context =="
sed -n '340,400p' server/tests/dev_command_operator_gate.rs
echo
echo "== full registry_pin COMMAND_NAMES in production const =="
sed -n '1,155p' server/src/cmd/registry_pin.rs
echo
echo "== identity command registration =="
sed -n '46,106p' server/src/identity/command.rs
echo
echo "== all occurrences of identity literal or register =="
rg -n 'literal\("identity"|add_command::<IdentityCmd>|identity::command|register\(.*identity' server/src server/testsRepository: Kizunad/Bong
Length of output: 9431
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -uo pipefail
echo "== pin tests =="
sed -n '1,280p' server/tests/dev_command_operator_gate.rs
echo
echo "== command pin references in tests =="
rg -n -C2 'COMMAND_(NAME|TREE|PATH)|pin|identity' server/tests/dev_command_operator_gate.rs server/src/cmd/registry_pin.rs
echo
echo "== deterministic probe: identity present in production pin vs runtime root check =="
python3 - <<'PY'
from pathlib import Path
import re
const_text = Path('server/src/cmd/registry_pin.rs').read_text()
test_text = Path('server/tests/dev_command_operator_gate.rs').read_text()
# Use a simple extraction that stays valid for the shown source shape.
m = re.search(r'pub const COMMAND_NAMES:\s*&\[&str\]\s*=\s*&\[(?P<body>.*?)\];', const_text, re.S)
if not m:
raise SystemExit('cannot parse COMMAND_NAMES')
body = m.group('body')
pin_names = [s.strip().strip('"\'') for s in body.split(',') if s.strip() and s.strip().startswith('"') and s.strip().endswith('"')]
print('COMMAND_NAMES_count:', len(pin_names))
print('COMMAND_NAMES_contains_identity:', 'identity' in pin_names)
print('COMMAND_NAMES_first_few:', pin_names[:3])
print('identity adjacent pins:', [pin for i, pin in enumerate(pin_names) if 'identity' in pin_low(pin) or pin_low(pin_low(pin_names[i-1]) in ['zones'] and pin_low('zones') in pin)] for _ in [])
def pin_low(s):
return s.lower()
test = (
'expected_roots = registry_pin::COMMAND_NAMES\n' in test_text
and 'expected_roots.insert("identity");' in test_text
)
print('test manually_inserts_identity:', test)
PYRepository: Kizunad/Bong
Length of output: 14276
把 identity 补进 registry_pin::COMMAND_NAMES，并删除 gate 测试中的硬编码补丁。
/identity 已由 IdentityCmd::assemble_graph 注册为根级命令，但 server/src/cmd/registry_pin.rs 和生产命令树 pin 测试中没有 identity，导致当前测试在第 386 行手动插入后再去检查 runtime root。这会让 root 遗漏规避 pin 测试。将 identity 加入 registry_pin::COMMAND_NAMES 和 COMMAND_TREE_PATHS 后，expected_roots.insert("identity") 不应再需要。
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@server/tests/dev_command_operator_gate.rs` around lines 382 - 390, 将生产注册清单中的
identity 补入 registry_pin::COMMAND_NAMES 和 COMMAND_TREE_PATHS，使其与
IdentityCmd::assemble_graph 注册的根级命令一致；随后在生产命令树 pin 测试中移除
expected_roots.insert("identity") 硬编码补丁，并保留基于 COMMAND_NAMES 生成 expected_roots
的校验逻辑。
Central reviewDecision: Validated findings[minor] Validate BOT_E2E_RUN_TAG before generating usernames and the operator roster
A fresh launch always constructs every bot username as Root cause: the new run-tag override is interpolated directly into both minecraft usernames and the comma-separated operator allowlist without enforcing the runner's stated length constraint or a username-safe character grammar. this makes malformed or oversized caller-provided tags reach server startup and bot execution. [major] Add regression coverage for exact operator-roster reuse gating
The changed reuse contract is implemented only in the shell branch at Root cause: the pull request changes the bot harness’s server identity and operator-trust boundary, but regression coverage exists only for the server consumer and not for the producer-side reuse decision and startup environment wiring. [major] Plan misstates master-matrix registration evidence
The new plan says the master matrix row for Root cause: the plan documents an atomic ownership/matrix-registration fact that is not true of the submitted change set. reviewers and implementers cannot use the stated commit as evidence that the master matrix registration and skeleton were introduced together. [major] Plan cites missing mandatory workflow documents
The new plan states that the root Root cause: the skeleton records repository-process documents as present/read without those files existing in the repository, while later phases depend on their referenced rules. this makes the stated p0 evidence and the implementation workflow factually unusable. [major] Include every command-using bot tag in the generated operator roster
A fresh self-start run exports Root cause: the newly introduced operator allowlist is manually enumerated but is not synchronized with all usernames generated by the bot scenario producer. fresh servers authorize only the listed run-tagged usernames, so omitted scenario users cannot traverse the command authorization path required by their scenarios. [minor] Default BOT_E2E_REUSE can no longer reuse the previous script-started server
在已有 server 上按脚本顶部记录的用法运行 Root cause: 复用资格依赖精确的 run-tag operator roster，但默认 run tag 每次按新 shell pid 重新生成；脚本既没有持久化/读取上一轮 roster，也没有更新顶部的复用用法来要求调用者显式提供匹配的 |
Central reviewDecision: Validated findings[major] P0 gate references undefined F04 and ambiguously gates F07
The new P0 checklist requires the implementer to “收口 F06/F08/F09; F04/F07 ... 收口” ( Root cause: the p0 acceptance checklist references an undefined decision identifier and assigns f07 a closure requirement that is not aligned with the plan's stated p0-owned decision set and open-question treatment. the phase gate therefore has no executable, unambiguous contract for when implementation may proceed. [major] R4 P2 adds prerequisites forbidden by the master ordering contract
Root cause: the r4 child plan retains an explicit phase-level cross-track prerequisite while the concurrently changed master plan prohibits child plans from introducing cross-track dependencies outside the wave table. the dependency must be amended into the master authority or removed/rephrased as a non-gating contract-first/activation condition. [major] Validate BOT_E2E_RUN_TAG before generating the operator roster
A caller-provided Root cause: the new roster generation treats an external run tag as trusted text and duplicates it across two independently parsed protocol boundaries without validating minecraft-safe characters, length, or the resulting username for every scenario. this allows malformed identities to reach server startup and can make operator authorization and bot login disagree or fail late. [major] Exercise public roots through the event-time authorization gate
The new suite verifies that public roots have empty command-tree scopes at Root cause: the changed authorization contract has two independent surfaces, command-tree visibility and event-time enforcement, but the public-root tests cover only the former. the event-time gate could accidentally apply operator authorization to public roots without any current regression test detecting the user-visible permission break. [major] Assert that rejected commands do not execute
Root cause: the test treats the rejection notification as proof of authorization enforcement, but notification and command cancellation are separate behaviors. a regression that lets unauthorized commands execute while retaining the chat message would be accepted by this suite, leaving the claimed permission contract unprotected. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
♻️ Duplicate comments (4)
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md (4)
398-400: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor使用规定的 §10 末节标题。
当前标题是
10.6 单次 consume-plan 收口。仓库规则要求 §10 最末包含精确标题“单次 consume-plan 全自动到 merge”。请将标题改为
### 10.6 单次 consume-plan 全自动到 merge，并保持该节为 §10 的最后一节。当前版本仍未解决历史评论指出的同一问题。As per coding guidelines, §10 最末必须包含“单次 consume-plan 全自动到 merge”章节。
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md` around lines 398 - 400, 将 §10 末节标题从“10.6 单次 consume-plan 收口”更新为精确标题“10.6 单次 consume-plan 全自动到 merge”，并确保该章节继续作为 §10 的最后一节。Source: Coding guidelines
341-345: 🩺 Stability & Availability | 🟠 Major为
pending增加独立的容量和生命周期策略。Line 343 只定义了
dead_letter。Lines 257 和 345 同时要求pending有界、可恢复，并验证其上限，但文档没有定义pending的max_items、max_bytes、max_payload_bytes、retention_ttl、cleanup owner 或 overflow policy。请增加
pendingpolicy row，并补充写入、恢复、过期清理和满载测试。当前版本仍未解决历史评论指出的同一问题。建议补充的 policy row
| `dead_letter` | finite `max_items` + `max_bytes`；每条记录有 `max_payload_bytes` | finite `retention_ttl`；由 agent Tiandao pipeline cleanup/archive job 到期清理或归档 | conservative default：reject new terminal record + emit `dead_letter_overflow`，不重新塞回 pending；若 P0 选择覆盖/暂停，必须记录取舍并保持有界 | 持续注入 malformed、publish-exhaustion、queue-overflow，验证 item/byte/TTL 上限及 overflow telemetry | +| `pending` | finite `max_items` + `max_bytes`；每条记录有 `max_payload_bytes` | finite `retention_ttl`；明确 cleanup/archive owner | 明确 reject、backpressure 或 requeue 边界，并记录 overflow telemetry | 持续注入 pending 写入、恢复、过期和满载场景，验证 item/byte/TTL 上限 |🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md` around lines 341 - 345, 为该容量与生命周期策略表补充独立的 pending policy row，明确 max_items、max_bytes、每条记录的 max_payload_bytes、retention_ttl、cleanup/archive owner，以及满载时的 overflow policy 和 telemetry 行为。同步完善 pending 的写入、恢复、过期清理和满载测试要求，并让验收覆盖这些边界及与 dead_letter 各自上限的断言。
341-345: 🔒 Security & Privacy | 🟠 MajorSensitive Data Exposure (CWE-359)
Reachability: Internal
限制
pendingpayload 的隐私保留周期。Line 181 定义
payload为原始事件或 renderer 输入。Line 190 允许该数据写入持久pending store。当前表格没有pending的 retention、cleanup 或归档规则。如果 payload 包含 player identity、target 或 world context，pending store 可能在处理目的结束后继续保留这些数据。请确认 payload 的字段分类和存储访问边界，并为
pending固定有限retention_ttl与 cleanup owner。历史评论已指出
pendingretention 缺失；当前版本仍未补齐该控制。🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md` around lines 341 - 345, 补充 pending store 的数据治理约束：明确 payload 字段分类及存储访问边界，并在 pending 的容量/生命周期规则中增加有限 retention_ttl、明确 cleanup 或归档 owner，以及到期处理方式。同步更新验收标准，验证 pending payload 按 TTL 被清理或归档，且不影响现有 pending 上限与 telemetry 断言。
385-392: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟠 Major把 agent commit 门禁改成可执行的仓库规则。
model: "opus"不是精确模型 ID。Line 392 还允许把真实模型 ID 写入commit trailer/PR body，但 PR body 不能替代 commit trailer。同时补充以下强制规则：
- 每个逻辑单元使用一个 atomic commit。
- commit message 必须使用中文。
- 每个 agent commit 必须包含
Model: <精确模型 id>trailer。- 禁止
--no-verify、--no-gpg-sign、未经确认的 force push、hard reset、amend 和交互式 rebase。当前版本仍未解决历史评论指出的同一问题。
As per coding guidelines, commit trailer 是强制控制，PR body 只能作为补充记录。
建议的修订
Agent( subagent_type: "claude", - model: "opus", + model: "<调用前由当前路由解析的精确模型 ID>", prompt: "<当前 PR 范围、依赖、测试与禁止项>\n\nultrathink" )+ - 每个逻辑单元使用一个 atomic commit，commit message 必须使用中文。 + - 每个 agent commit 必须包含 `Model: <精确模型 id>` trailer；PR body 只能补充记录。 + - 禁止 `--no-verify`、`--no-gpg-sign`、未经确认的 force push、hard reset、amend 和交互式 rebase。🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md` around lines 385 - 392, 修订 Agent 执行与提交门禁规则：将 Agent 配置中的 "opus" 替换为当时路由记录的精确模型 ID；要求每个逻辑单元使用一个 atomic commit、提交信息必须为中文，且每个 agent commit 必须包含 Model: <精确模型 id> trailer，真实模型 ID 不得仅记录在 PR body。明确禁止 --no-verify、--no-gpg-sign、未经确认的 force push、hard reset、amend 和交互式 rebase，并保留 agent 仅实现、测试、push、创建 PR 后返回 URL、HEAD 与门禁证据的职责范围。Source: Coding guidelines
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.md`:
- Line 23: 在 P1/P2 的相关计划条目中补充可直接实现的拒绝回执体验规格：定义 R10 reason code 到 client
toast/HUD 的映射、优先级与未知原因的 fallback，并明确适用的音效、动画、环境、粒子和 narration 行为；同时保留
accepted/rejected outcome 通过 R6 emit API 传递，避免仅描述数据交付或将这些玩家可感知行为推迟到后续阶段。
- Line 23: 在该计划文档末尾补充“§10 实施工作流”，按依赖顺序定义至少 4 个 PR 的串行拆分边界、每个 PR
的范围与验证条件，并明确禁止未满足前置条件时提前合并。新增“单次 consume-plan 全自动到
merge”章节，描述从消费计划、自动执行与验证到合并的完整流程，同时保持现有 P0–P4、吸收清单和开放问题内容不变。
- Line 23: Update the owner plan for R6 to define the frozen API, phase, and
schema for the R6 emit contract, including request ID, revision, authoritative
item view, and rejected-reason fields for InventoryEventV1::Moved and
inventory_receive_rejected. Then synchronize this phase’s references to those
exact definitions, keeping the current change limited to declared, unwired,
test-only contract/pin work and preventing production traffic activation until
the R6 production seam is ready.
---
Duplicate comments:
In `@docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md`:
- Around line 398-400: 将 §10 末节标题从“10.6 单次 consume-plan 收口”更新为精确标题“10.6 单次
consume-plan 全自动到 merge”，并确保该章节继续作为 §10 的最后一节。
- Around line 341-345: 为该容量与生命周期策略表补充独立的 pending policy row，明确
max_items、max_bytes、每条记录的 max_payload_bytes、retention_ttl、cleanup/archive
owner，以及满载时的 overflow policy 和 telemetry 行为。同步完善 pending
的写入、恢复、过期清理和满载测试要求，并让验收覆盖这些边界及与 dead_letter 各自上限的断言。
- Around line 341-345: 补充 pending store 的数据治理约束：明确 payload 字段分类及存储访问边界，并在
pending 的容量/生命周期规则中增加有限 retention_ttl、明确 cleanup 或归档 owner，以及到期处理方式。同步更新验收标准，验证
pending payload 按 TTL 被清理或归档，且不影响现有 pending 上限与 telemetry 断言。
- Around line 385-392: 修订 Agent 执行与提交门禁规则：将 Agent 配置中的 "opus" 替换为当时路由记录的精确模型
ID；要求每个逻辑单元使用一个 atomic commit、提交信息必须为中文，且每个 agent commit 必须包含 Model: <精确模型 id>
trailer，真实模型 ID 不得仅记录在 PR body。明确禁止 --no-verify、--no-gpg-sign、未经确认的 force
push、hard reset、amend 和交互式 rebase，并保留 agent 仅实现、测试、push、创建 PR 后返回 URL、HEAD
与门禁证据的职责范围。
🪄 Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 8ea7db5b-380b-49fd-bc4a-5277c8f11967
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.md
📜 Review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (1)
- GitHub Check: e2e
⚠️ CI failures not shown inline (2)
GitHub Actions: Review consumer tests / test: skeleton: agent 叙事管道计划 v1（§10.1.1 促升）
Conclusion: failure
##[group]Run set -euo pipefail
�[36;1mset -euo pipefail�[0m
�[36;1m[[ "$(git -C _central-contract rev-parse HEAD)" == '2986b95388b3ac3f8bf28b8ebdd60a19d2e4364c' ]]�[0m
�[36;1m[[ "$(git -C 9dcee849e3a0b45bd9a8fe663b48ae3fb1d82784 rev-parse HEAD)" == '9dcee849e3a0b45bd9a8fe663b48ae3fb1d82784' ]]�[0m
�[36;1mnode --check .github/scripts/review-consumer.test.mjs�[0m
�[36;1mCENTRAL_REVIEW_CONTRACT_DIR=_central-contract \�[0m
�[36;1m PROVIDER_CANARY_CONTRACT_DIR=9dcee849e3a0b45bd9a8fe663b48ae3fb1d82784 \�[0m
�[36;1m node --test .github/scripts/review-consumer.test.mjs�[0m
�[36;1m(�[0m
�[36;1m cd _central-contract�[0m
�[36;1m npm test�[0m
�[36;1m)�[0m
�[36;1mgit diff --check�[0m
shell: /usr/bin/bash --noprofile --norc -e -o pipefail {0}
env:
BWRAP_EXECUTABLE: /home/runner/work/Bong/Bong/_sandbox-package/root/usr/bin/bwrap
##[endgroup]
✔ shadow caller pins the central workflow and preserves the trusted trigger gate (5.909751ms)
✔ shadow caller job exactly matches the reviewed reusable contract (1.508065ms)
✔ consumer CI checks out and tests the exact central workflow contract (1.162457ms)
✔ checked-out central workflow matches the complete immutable publication contract (2.902203ms)
✔ central publication contract rejects every input and secret set drift (2.965276ms)
✔ caller publication contract rejects mapping, secret, and permission drift (1.478561ms)
✔ central permission contract rejects unbound and non-block permission forms (1.513283ms)
✔ checked-out provider canary release matches its caller interface (1.594811ms)
✔ provider canary publication contract rejects every input and secret set drift (1.383463ms)
✔ provider canary remains dispatch-only, minimally permissioned, and secret-isolated (2.345693ms)
✖ Bong policy is bounded declarative data with canonical project rules (2.641652ms)
ℹ tests 11
ℹ suites 0
ℹ pass 10
ℹ fail 1
ℹ cancelled 0
ℹ skipped 0
ℹ todo 0
ℹ duration_ms 89.851639
✖ failing tests:
test at .github/scripts/r...
GitHub Actions: Review consumer tests / 0_test.txt: skeleton: agent 叙事管道计划 v1（§10.1.1 促升）
Conclusion: failure
##[group]Run set -euo pipefail
�[36;1mset -euo pipefail�[0m
�[36;1m[[ "$(git -C _central-contract rev-parse HEAD)" == '2986b95388b3ac3f8bf28b8ebdd60a19d2e4364c' ]]�[0m
�[36;1m[[ "$(git -C 9dcee849e3a0b45bd9a8fe663b48ae3fb1d82784 rev-parse HEAD)" == '9dcee849e3a0b45bd9a8fe663b48ae3fb1d82784' ]]�[0m
�[36;1mnode --check .github/scripts/review-consumer.test.mjs�[0m
�[36;1mCENTRAL_REVIEW_CONTRACT_DIR=_central-contract \�[0m
�[36;1m PROVIDER_CANARY_CONTRACT_DIR=9dcee849e3a0b45bd9a8fe663b48ae3fb1d82784 \�[0m
�[36;1m node --test .github/scripts/review-consumer.test.mjs�[0m
�[36;1m(�[0m
�[36;1m cd _central-contract�[0m
�[36;1m npm test�[0m
�[36;1m)�[0m
�[36;1mgit diff --check�[0m
shell: /usr/bin/bash --noprofile --norc -e -o pipefail {0}
env:
BWRAP_EXECUTABLE: /home/runner/work/Bong/Bong/_sandbox-package/root/usr/bin/bwrap
##[endgroup]
✔ shadow caller pins the central workflow and preserves the trusted trigger gate (5.909751ms)
✔ shadow caller job exactly matches the reviewed reusable contract (1.508065ms)
✔ consumer CI checks out and tests the exact central workflow contract (1.162457ms)
✔ checked-out central workflow matches the complete immutable publication contract (2.902203ms)
✔ central publication contract rejects every input and secret set drift (2.965276ms)
✔ caller publication contract rejects mapping, secret, and permission drift (1.478561ms)
✔ central permission contract rejects unbound and non-block permission forms (1.513283ms)
✔ checked-out provider canary release matches its caller interface (1.594811ms)
✔ provider canary publication contract rejects every input and secret set drift (1.383463ms)
✔ provider canary remains dispatch-only, minimally permissioned, and secret-isolated (2.345693ms)
✖ Bong policy is bounded declarative data with canonical project rules (2.641652ms)
ℹ tests 11
ℹ suites 0
ℹ pass 10
ℹ fail 1
ℹ cancelled 0
ℹ skipped 0
ℹ todo 0
ℹ duration_ms 89.851639
✖ failing tests:
test at .github/scripts/r...
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
docs/**/*.md
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (docs/CLAUDE.md)
docs/**/*.md: 新 plan 头部必须写明接入面：进料、出料、复用的共享类型/event/schema、server/agent/client 跨仓库契约，以及对应的worldview.md锚点。
涉及真元、灵气、衰减、逸散、半衰、距离损耗、排斥或吸力的 plan，必须调用qi_physics；新物理常数和公式必须先扩展qi_physics，不得在功能 plan 中重复实现。
所有真元/灵气流动必须遵守守恒律并通过qi_physics::ledger::QiTransfer；释放使用qi_release_to_zone，吸收使用qi_excretion，不得凭空生成或销毁真元。
涉及玩家可感知行为的 plan，必须在对应机制阶段中内联可直接实现的粒子、音效、HUD、环境、动画和 narration 规格；不得将视听内容笼统推迟到独立阶段。纯 server 逻辑 plan 例外。
每份 plan 必须列出开放问题；实施前必须追加§N.1 决议，逐项给出结论、实施方案、边界条件，并以文件:行号和 plan 章节双锚点落地。
scope 大于或等于 4 个 PR 的 plan，必须在末尾包含§10 实施工作流，并按依赖顺序在一个 plan 内序列化多个 PR，不得拆成多个 plan。
涉及 NBT 建筑、worldgen layout 或复杂视觉资产的 TODO，必须完成三轮提交：(round 1/3)、(round 2/3)、(round 3/3)；终轮提交必须包含拼写准确的<PROMISE>担保块。
§10 最末必须包含“单次 consume-plan 全自动到 merge”章节，明确用户提交/consume-plan后即可等待最终归档至docs/finished_plans/。引用世界观内容时统一使用
worldview.md §X L<line>格式；不得自动修改docs/worldview.md或主动回写docs/library/。
Files:
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md
docs/plans-skeleton/**/*.md
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
新 plan 必须先读取
docs/CLAUDE.md；骨架、Active 和 Finished plan 必须遵循三态流转及规定的阶段状态、Finish Evidence 结构。
Files:
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md
**/*
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
**/*: commit message 必须使用中文，每个逻辑单元一个 atomic commit；agent 生成的 commit 必须带真实模型Model: <精确模型 id>trailer。
禁止使用--no-verify、--no-gpg-sign、关闭签名配置、未经确认的 force push、hard reset、amend 或交互式 rebase。
禁止留下 auto-stash 产生的孤儿 WIP stash；自动 stash 流程完成后必须恢复自己的 stash。
Files:
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md
🧠 Learnings (3)
📚 Learning: 2026-07-17T00:31:10.779Z
Learnt from: Kizunad
Repo: Kizunad/Bong PR: 1218
File: docs/plans-skeleton/plan-skill-av-relink-v1.md:1-1
Timestamp: 2026-07-17T00:31:10.779Z
Learning: 在审查该仓库 `docs/plans-skeleton/` 下的“docs-only skeleton plan”创建类 PR 时：先核对 `docs/CLAUDE.md` 中“Plan 消费规范”，并逐份查看本计划文档里的“§10 实施工作流”，确认后续实施阶段是否会遵循“每个 PR 只修改一个 plan”，且实施/归档时不会出现跨 plan 的修改。该规则不适用于用户显式指定、共享调研基线且计划之间存在互相交叉引用的 skeleton plan 同批创建 PR；对这类情况应按实际交叉引用关系放宽，确保仍能按独立或约定的序列化方式推进。
Applied to files:
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md
📚 Learning: 2026-07-17T00:31:13.643Z
Learnt from: Kizunad
Repo: Kizunad/Bong PR: 1218
File: docs/plans-skeleton/plan-skill-av-relink-v1.md:81-85
Timestamp: 2026-07-17T00:31:13.643Z
Learning: 审核 docs/plans-skeleton/*.md 下的 skeleton 草案 PR 时：不得要求作者在“§N 开放问题（P0 决策门前需收口）”核查完成之前提前填写对应的“§N.1 决议”。仅当计划进入 active 且 P0 实施前，已由 Explore agent 并行核查代码现状后，才允许追加“§N.1 决议”，且该决议需包含结论、实施方案、边界条件，并使用“文件:行号 + plan 章节”的双锚点格式。
Applied to files:
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md
📚 Learning: 2026-07-22T02:11:59.191Z
Learnt from: Kizunad
Repo: Kizunad/Bong PR: 1247
File: docs/plans-skeleton/plan-bughunt-animal-air-spawn-gravity-v1.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2026-07-22T02:11:59.191Z
Learning: 在 `docs/plans-skeleton/` 目录下的计划状态行中，若起草日期同时涉及 UTC 与本地日期（例如时区换算后可能跨到不同日期），请在该行中同时标注 UTC 起草日与本地起草日。这样可以避免基于 UTC 的时间基准在 GitHub/CodeRabbit 审查时将本地日期误判为“未来日期”。
Applied to files:
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.mddocs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md
🔇 Additional comments (7)
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-agent-narration-pipeline-v1.md (7)
47-51: LGTM!
191-191: LGTM!
252-252: LGTM!
321-321: LGTM!
367-367: LGTM!
29-32: 🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration无需修改：source 计数已说明重叠关系。
当前文本已说明：本 plan 将 25 个 confirmed source 加上跨簇
#1702得到 26 个 confirmed source；其中#1475/#1509/#1527/#1538 共享#1470，而#1607/#1674/#1746 移入 §4.4，不计入本 plan 账本。
29-32: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality无需改动现有 plan 内容。
docs/CLAUDE.md只将骨架列为docs/plan-*.md中的“将来要写”占位，并未要求docs/plans-skeleton/**/*.md骨架必须先读该文件；且该 skeleton 已在 §0.2 和 P0 记录中明确 rootCLAUDE.md/docs/CLAUDE.md缺失时立即阻塞。> Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
| - ⬜ P0 设计收口 + 吸收清单验真：113 个变体普查（每个标注应有的门禁四元组现状）；冻结 `GateSpec` 与拒绝回执语义；等 #1287（冷却重构，同文件大改）merge 定基线。 | ||
| - ⬜ P1 门禁中间件落地：gate 层上线，先给"已知漏洞簇"的 ~20 个请求类型挂 spec（吸收清单全命中），旧内联校验保留并行断言一个版本期。 | ||
| - ⬜ P2 巨石拆分批次 A：巨型 match 拆为按域 handler 注册表（combat/production/world/social/npc 五组），行为不变，bot 场景锁住；inventory pickup handler 必须从 ECS `CurrentDimension`、authoritative position/observation range 与 owner/private permission 构造 R10 `PickupAuthorization`，禁止仅凭 client XYZ/instance id 调用 txn，且把 R10 accepted/rejected outcome 交给 R6 emit API。**本批次的 inventory pickup consumer 仅在 R10 P3 pickup/merge txn、R5 P3 attrition API 与 R6 P4 receipt API 均已合入后实施；此前不得以 mock 或旧 R6 P1 schema 接线。** | ||
| - ⬜ P2 巨石拆分批次 A：巨型 match 拆为按域 handler 注册表（combat/production/world/social/npc 五组），行为不变，bot 场景锁住；inventory pickup handler 必须从 ECS `CurrentDimension`、authoritative position/observation range 与 owner/private permission 构造 R10 `PickupAuthorization`，禁止仅凭 client XYZ/instance id 调用 txn，且把 R10 accepted/rejected outcome 交给 R6 emit API。该 consumer 的 production activation 必须遵守 `plan-refactor-master-v1.md §3` Wave 表及其 atomicity/ownership invariants；在上游 artifact 尚未就绪时只允许 declared、unwired、test-only 的 contract/pin，不得把本阶段新增的 phase-level prerequisite 作为跨轨 start/order gate。 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟠 Major | 🏗️ Heavy lift
在 P2 内联拒绝回执的可直接实施规格。
P2 要求把 R10 的 accepted/rejected outcome 交给 R6 emit API。接入面又声明拒绝回执由 client 的 toast/HUD 消费。因此该 plan 不是纯 server 逻辑。请在 P1/P2 内联 reason code 到 HUD/toast 的映射、优先级、fallback，以及适用的音效、动画、环境、粒子和 narration 规格。当前文字只定义了数据交付，没有定义玩家可感知行为。
As per coding guidelines：涉及玩家可感知行为的 plan 必须在对应机制阶段内联可直接实现的粒子、音效、HUD、环境、动画和 narration 规格，不得笼统推迟。
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.md` at line 23, 在 P1/P2
的相关计划条目中补充可直接实现的拒绝回执体验规格：定义 R10 reason code 到 client toast/HUD 的映射、优先级与未知原因的
fallback，并明确适用的音效、动画、环境、粒子和 narration 行为；同时保留 accepted/rejected outcome 通过 R6
emit API 传递，避免仅描述数据交付或将这些玩家可感知行为推迟到后续阶段。
Source: Coding guidelines
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
file="docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.md"
rg -n '(^|[[:space:]])§10|实施工作流|单次 consume-plan 全自动到 merge' "$file"Repository: Kizunad/Bong
Length of output: 150
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
file="docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.md"
printf '--- file size and section markers ---\n'
wc -l "$file"
od -c "$file" | grep -E '§[0-9]+|Prerequisite|Phase|阶段|§10|实施工作流|单次 consume-plan 全自动到 merge' | head -80 || true
printf '\n--- outline of section headings ---\n'
rg -n '^(#+|§[0-9]+|[A-Z0-9]+)' "$file" | head -120
printf '\n--- P-phase references ---\n'
rg -n '\bP[0-9]\b|113|20\+|巨石拆分|Handler|consumer|pickup|吸收计划|§3|§10|实施工作流|单次 consume-plan 全自动到 merge' "$file"Repository: Kizunad/Bong
Length of output: 241
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
file="docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.md"
echo '--- file size and section markers ---'
wc -l "$file"
od -c "$file" | grep -E '§[0-9]+|Prerequisite|Phase|阶段|§10|实施工作流|单次 consume-plan 全自动到 merge' | head -80 || true
echo
echo '--- outline of section headings ---'
rg -n '^(#+|§[0-9]+|[A-Z0-9]+)' "$file" | head -120
echo
echo '--- P-phase references ---'
rg -n '\bP[0-9]\b|113|20\+|巨石拆分|Handler|consumer|pickup|吸收计划|§3|§10|实施工作流|单次 consume-plan 全自动到 merge' "$file"Repository: Kizunad/Bong
Length of output: 3504
补齐 §10 实施工作流并给出 PR 拆分边界。
当前文档仅列 P0–P4、吸收清单和开放问题，没有结尾的 §10 实施工作流。若本计划 scope ≥ 4 个 PR，必须在末尾按依赖顺序串行拆分多个 PR，并包含“单次 consume-plan 全自动到 merge”章节。
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.md` at line 23, 在该计划文档末尾补充“§10
实施工作流”，按依赖顺序定义至少 4 个 PR 的串行拆分边界、每个 PR 的范围与验证条件，并明确禁止未满足前置条件时提前合并。新增“单次
consume-plan 全自动到 merge”章节，描述从消费计划、自动执行与验证到合并的完整流程，同时保持现有 P0–P4、吸收清单和开放问题内容不变。
Source: Coding guidelines
🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
for file in \
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-master-v1.md \
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-wire-s2c-v1.md \
docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.md
do
echo "===== $file ====="
rg -n -C 8 'InventoryEventV1|PickupAuthorization|accepted|rejected|emit|unwired|test-only|atomic|production activation|P[0-4]' "$file"
doneRepository: Kizunad/Bong
Length of output: 25812
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
echo "===== docs/CLAUDE.md if present ====="
if [ -f docs/CLAUDE.md ]; then
wc -l docs/CLAUDE.md
fi
echo
echo "===== relevant ownership section around R6/R10/R4 ====="
sed -n '37,81p' docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-master-v1.md | cat -n
echo
echo "===== relevant phase sections in R10 skeleton if present ====="
if [ -f docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-inventory-core-v1.md ]; then
wc -l docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-inventory-core-v1.md
rg -n -C 8 'PickupAuthorization|inventory receipt|InventoryEventV1|accepted|rejected|Moved|P[0-5]|phase|contract|production' docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-inventory-core-v1.md
else
echo "missing docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-inventory-core-v1.md"
fi
echo
echo "===== broad search for InventoryEventV1 and PickupAuthorization definitions/usages ====="
rg -n 'InventoryEventV1|PickupAuthorization|InventoryEventHandler|inventory receipt|accepted|rejected' . \
--glob '!target/**' --glob '!build/**' --glob '!node_modules/**' | head -n 200Repository: Kizunad/Bong
Length of output: 50368
明确 R6 emit API 的契约和生产启用边界。
R6 拥有 *_emit.rs 公共层和生成/传输契约，R4 P2 只应引用 R6 owner plan 已定义的冻结 API 名称、phase 与 schema；目前 InventoryEventV1::Moved 和 inventory_receive_rejected 还未定义 request id、revision、权威 item view 及 rejected reason/schema。请在 owner plan 中定义后同步本阶段引用；本阶段只提交 contract/pin，不得在生产接缝未就绪时切换 production traffic。
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@docs/plans-skeleton/plan-refactor-c2s-gate-v1.md` at line 23, Update the
owner plan for R6 to define the frozen API, phase, and schema for the R6 emit
contract, including request ID, revision, authoritative item view, and
rejected-reason fields for InventoryEventV1::Moved and
inventory_receive_rejected. Then synchronize this phase’s references to those
exact definitions, keeping the current change limited to declared, unwired,
test-only contract/pin work and preventing production traffic activation until
the R6 production seam is ready.
Central reviewDecision: Validated findings[major] Pin suite leaves the new source and target variants unprotected
P1 changes the observable Root cause: the test matrix is phase-centric even though the changed wire contract adds three independently observable dimensions. it omits variant-complete positive and negative pins for [major] Use the real command-registration and execution path in the operator-gate integration test
Root cause: the regression suite tests an isolated manually assembled command graph rather than the repository's production registration and event producer, so it cannot detect a disconnected operator gate or a broken production command-wiring contract. [major] Source ledger double-counts #1702
Root cause: the source-ledger accounting treats [major] Public-root test self-validates privilege expansion
Root cause: the permission test uses the mutable production allowlist as its expected value, making an accidental privilege expansion self-validating and leaving the public-root authorization boundary unpinned. [major] Inventory sequence adds an unauthorized R6 P3 prerequisite
Root cause: the revised arrow sequence encodes an additional cross-track start/order dependency instead of merely recording the dependency needed for r10 p2b. master-plan §3 explicitly reserves inter-track sequencing authority to the wave table, so the child plan's local ordering makes the production cutover and provider phases disagree about which artifacts are prerequisites. [major] Event-time gate test does not prove commands are blocked
For each protected root, the test injects only the bare root name and asserts solely that a rejection chat message appears. It never asserts that no Root cause: the claimed event-time authorization test verifies the denial message rather than denial of command execution, and uses syntactically incomplete commands, so it does not pin the security property that unauthorized events cannot produce privileged effects. |
将已审计的 Tiandao narration pipeline 草案整理为仓库 plans-skeleton，保留 source issue ledger、决策门与开放问题。 Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
移除文档末尾多余空行，保持 skeleton 文件通过仓库 whitespace 检查。 Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
按现有 Pub/Sub 与 narration wire 能力收窄恢复、确认和路由承诺，并补齐并发账本与实施工作流。 Model: cc-sonnet-high Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Model: cc-haiku-max Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
补齐 broadcast 正向路由兼容案例，修正 offline:<name> 兼容性分类，明确 P0 退出决策门并移除内存 pending 选项。 Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
登记 Agent 轨归属，移出独立 world-model/query-tool follow-up，并明确业务状态提交先于 terminal published。 Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
将已审计的 Tiandao narration pipeline 草案整理为仓库 plans-skeleton，保留 source issue ledger、决策门与开放问题。 Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
移除文档末尾多余空行，保持 skeleton 文件通过仓库 whitespace 检查。 Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
按现有 Pub/Sub 与 narration wire 能力收窄恢复、确认和路由承诺，并补齐并发账本与实施工作流。 Model: cc-sonnet-high Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Model: cc-haiku-max Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
补齐 broadcast 正向路由兼容案例，修正 offline:<name> 兼容性分类，明确 P0 退出决策门并移除内存 pending 选项。 Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
补齐 operator roster、reuse gating、run tag 校验与流程证据边界。 Model: deepseek-v4-flash-max Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- 明确 F07 的 P0 归属并移除未定义 F04 - 对齐 R4 与总纲 Wave 顺序权威 - 补齐 bot roster 与 public-root event-time 验收断言 Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
482ebcf to
19dd59f
Compare
1 participant
flash-review cluster 3（29 confirmed source，含 4 条 #1470 重复证据）促升的 skeleton。草稿经独立审计（9 findings 已修订）。
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_014Az49y7KGz1xT91uYMMbUx