add CDEPS inline data for GFS_surface_composites_pre/post

[grantfirl]

Description of changes

This PR should have no actual effect on CMEPS. The CCPP suite that CMEPS is calling contains 2 schemes that have changed interfaces from ufs-community/ccpp-physics#298. Specifically, more variables are required by GFS_surface_composites_pre/post. This PR simply adds these variables to the typedefs and metadata so that CMEPS can successfully compile and run with the ccpp-physics changes. The behavior of the 2 schemes with changed interfaces should not change as long as the preprocessor directive CDEPS_INLINE is not defined (by default) and the USE_CDEPS_INLINE environment variable is set to False (by default).

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any:
@uturuncoglu

CMEPS Issues Fixed (include github issue #):
None

Are changes expected to change answers? (specify if bfb, different at roundoff, more substantial)
Should be b4b

Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)?
No

Testing performed

Please describe the tests along with the target model and machine(s)
If possible, please also added hashes that were used in the testing

UFS RTs on Ursa

[NickSzapiro-NOAA]

So CMEPS already has a separate, existing CDEPS_INLINE directive. Are these starting to conflict since we set -DCDEPS_INLINE=ON in compile at ufs-weather-model level?

[grantfirl]

So CMEPS already has a separate, existing CDEPS_INLINE directive. Are these starting to conflict since we set -DCDEPS_INLINE=ON in compile at ufs-weather-model level?

@uturuncoglu This is probably a question for you. How do the functionalities differ? Can CDEPS inherit the CDEPS_inline from ufs-weather-model?

[gspetro-NOAA]

Could we get another review on this sub-PR so that we can process WM parent PR 2807?

[gspetro-NOAA]

@grantfirl @NickSzapiro-NOAA Who else should review this PR? We need one more review here to schedule WM 2807.

EDIT: We have decided to begin testing on WM PR 2807 since this sub-PR does have one approval, but the sooner someone can add the second review, the better.

[grantfirl]

@grantfirl @NickSzapiro-NOAA Who else should review this PR? We need one more review here to schedule WM 2807.

EDIT: We have decided to begin testing on WM PR 2807 since this sub-PR does have one approval, but the sooner someone can add the second review, the better.

@gspetro-NOAA I don't know who develops in this repo other than those already listed as reviewers.

[DeniseWorthen]

@gspetro-NOAA That would be me...I've approved now.

[BrianCurtis-NOAA]

Upstream testing finished. This can be merged.