[16.0] [MIG] account_operating_unit #596
Conversation
… view in report. Other minor fixes.
…f setting an inter-OU accounts triggers from other modules when creating companies
* Add management of payments using operating units * Trial Balance by operating units * Improve tests
Currently translated at 100.0% (26 of 26 strings) Translation: operating-unit-15.0/operating-unit-15.0-account_operating_unit Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/operating-unit-15-0/operating-unit-15-0-account_operating_unit/es_MX/
|
/ocabot migration account_operating_unit |
BT-aleonard
force-pushed
the
16.0-mig-account_operating_unit
branch
from
2a597f3
to
aa19afb
Compare
|
@AaronHForgeFlow can you review this PR, please? |
| <field name="inherit_id" ref="account.view_account_journal_form" /> | ||
| <field name="arch" type="xml"> | ||
| <field name="company_id" position="after"> | ||
| <field |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I cannot see this field in journals in runbot. Can you check?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's the normal company_id field.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the field appears twice on the form definition, first globally and invisible, second with a groups restriction, and we want to use the second one. I suggest changing the anchor point for the extension (see suggested change), as I'm not sure it's legit to have an anchor on a field which is group-restricted.
BT-aleonard
force-pushed
the
16.0-mig-account_operating_unit
branch
from
aa19afb
to
2a84a5d
Compare
|
Can you please include this? #616 |
| <field name="inherit_id" ref="account.view_account_journal_form" /> | ||
| <field name="arch" type="xml"> | ||
| <field name="company_id" position="after"> | ||
| <field |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the field appears twice on the form definition, first globally and invisible, second with a groups restriction, and we want to use the second one. I suggest changing the anchor point for the extension (see suggested change), as I'm not sure it's legit to have an anchor on a field which is group-restricted.
| <field name="inherit_id" ref="account.view_account_journal_form" /> | ||
| <field name="arch" type="xml"> | ||
| <field name="company_id" position="after"> | ||
| <field |
|
Can you include this? #610 Thanks in advance!. |
|
Will this continue?, I've tried installing this and does't work :( |
|
@raulovallet If you fixed it you can create a new PR as this one seems stale |
|
In account_move_view there is still a reference to account_analytic_id, whereas that field is not in account_move_line anymore |
|
I propose to supersede this with #656 |
|
Superseded |
Includes PRs:
#616
#610