Skip to content

smtp: exit data mode if data command was rejected#10739

Closed
catenacyber wants to merge 1 commit intoOISF:masterfrom
catenacyber:smtp-data-rejected-6906-v1
Closed

smtp: exit data mode if data command was rejected#10739
catenacyber wants to merge 1 commit intoOISF:masterfrom
catenacyber:smtp-data-rejected-6906-v1

Conversation

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

@catenacyber catenacyber commented Mar 30, 2024

Link to redmine ticket:
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/6906

Describe changes:

  • smtp: exit data mode if data command was rejected

Will need a QA rebase line as #10734

SV_BRANCH=pr/1737

OISF/suricata-verify#1737

And the server was advertising pipelining.

Ticket: 6906
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.66%. Comparing base (ee50fe4) to head (e9789dc).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #10739      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.52%   82.66%   +4.13%     
==========================================
  Files         926      926              
  Lines      247464   247656     +192     
==========================================
+ Hits       194331   204714   +10383     
+ Misses      53133    42942   -10191     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 64.03% <100.00%> (-0.21%) ⬇️
suricata-verify 62.00% <0.00%> (?)
unittests 62.18% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@suricata-qa
Copy link

ERROR:

ERROR: QA failed on SURI_TLPW1_files_sha256.

Pipeline 19888

@jufajardini
Copy link
Contributor

This one looks good to me. Is anything preventing its approval, or are we waiting as this will require a QA rebase line?

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor Author

This one looks good to me. Is anything preventing its approval, or are we waiting as this will require a QA rebase line?

I guess this is not the priority before the release, cc @victorjulien ?

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased in #10981

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants