JA4 for TLS and QUIC -- v11

[satta]

Previous PR: #10725

Link to redmine ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/6379

Changes to previous PR:

• Rebase against current master.
• Put stray JA4 line into correct commit.
• Add comment explaining why nof_exts is used as a separate field.
• Use Rust's std::cmp::min instead of using explicit ifs.
• Adopt the new style guard headers prefixed with SURICATA and without leading/trailing underscores.
• Condense JA4/JA3 documentation into single RST document.

SV_BRANCH=pr/1761

[satta]

No idea about the single failing test, seems unrelated to the PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 83.54701% with 77 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 82.69%. Comparing base (172b55c) to head (4336ec7).
Report is 7 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #10829      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.75%   82.69%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         928      931       +3     
  Lines      247913   248332     +419     
==========================================
+ Hits       205162   205370     +208     
- Misses      42751    42962     +211     

Flag	Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus	64.07% <64.28%> (-0.17%)	⬇️
suricata-verify	62.13% <83.70%> (+0.13%)	⬆️
unittests	62.15% <44.23%> (-0.03%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[victorjulien]

No idea about the single failing test, seems unrelated to the PR.

Agreed, a restart fixed it.

[victorjulien]

Thanks @satta, I think this looks really good. A few comments inline.

[satta]

New PR: #10836