Skip to content

Websockets 2695 v19#10849

Closed
catenacyber wants to merge 7 commits intoOISF:masterfrom
catenacyber:websockets-2695-v19
Closed

Websockets 2695 v19#10849
catenacyber wants to merge 7 commits intoOISF:masterfrom
catenacyber:websockets-2695-v19

Conversation

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

Link to redmine ticket:
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/2695

Describe changes:

SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#1571

#10842 with 32-bit compatible build, and rustfmt for websocket code

if no config option is found,
as is done for udp

Ticket: 6304
Including the one for websocket over HTTP/2
port is used in AppLayerProtoDetectProbingParserPort
and not in AppLayerProtoDetectProbingParserElement
As for WebSocket which is detected only by protocol change.
When there is a protocol change, and a specific protocol is
expected, like WebSeocket, always run it, no matter the port.
@victorjulien victorjulien modified the milestone: 8.0 Apr 16, 2024
@suricata-qa
Copy link

WARNING:

field baseline test %
SURI_TLPR1_stats_chk
.decoder.event.ppp.wrong_type 2862 0 -
.decoder.event.ppp.unsup_proto 931 3772 405.16%

Pipeline 20081

@victorjulien
Copy link
Member

Minor merge conflict after JA4 merge, please do another rebase and I'll fast track it.

@victorjulien victorjulien added the needs rebase Needs rebase to main label Apr 16, 2024
@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased in #10866

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs rebase Needs rebase to main

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants