Skip to content

Comments

Websockets 2695 v20#10866

Closed
catenacyber wants to merge 7 commits intoOISF:masterfrom
catenacyber:websockets-2695-v20
Closed

Websockets 2695 v20#10866
catenacyber wants to merge 7 commits intoOISF:masterfrom
catenacyber:websockets-2695-v20

Conversation

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

Link to redmine ticket:
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/2695

Describe changes:

SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#1571

#10849 with needed rebase

if no config option is found,
as is done for udp

Ticket: 6304
Including the one for websocket over HTTP/2
port is used in AppLayerProtoDetectProbingParserPort
and not in AppLayerProtoDetectProbingParserElement
As for WebSocket which is detected only by protocol change.
When there is a protocol change, and a specific protocol is
expected, like WebSeocket, always run it, no matter the port.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 16, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 87.30469% with 65 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 82.79%. Comparing base (ce1556c) to head (1d1b039).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #10866      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.95%   82.79%   -0.17%     
==========================================
  Files         917      922       +5     
  Lines      247361   247814     +453     
==========================================
- Hits       205198   205170      -28     
- Misses      42163    42644     +481     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 64.26% <58.98%> (-0.24%) ⬇️
suricata-verify 62.11% <78.12%> (-0.20%) ⬇️
unittests 62.21% <21.87%> (-0.09%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@victorjulien victorjulien added this to the 8.0 milestone Apr 17, 2024
@victorjulien
Copy link
Member

Merged in #10873, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants