build: solaris porting changes

[l1gi]

Ticket: 7005

Description:

This updates the Solaris porting changes on top of current upstream main.

Changes include:

• guarding DT_* / dirent usage where not available
• using __sun and Solaris byteorder helpers
• avoiding tm_gmtoff access on Solaris
• guarding LOG_FTP
• enabling SPARC misalignment emulation
• guarding RLIMIT_NPROC

[github-actions]

NOTE: This PR may contain new authors.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 90.90909% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 82.77%. Comparing base (9e82ff8) to head (e1a290f).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #15513      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.77%   82.77%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         999      999              
  Lines      272666   272667       +1     
==========================================
- Hits       225700   225691       -9     
- Misses      46966    46976      +10     

Flag	Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus	61.43% <18.18%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
livemode	18.28% <63.63%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
netns	22.74% <9.09%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
pcap	44.91% <18.18%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
suricata-verify	66.42% <45.45%> (-0.03%)	⬇️
unittests	58.40% <36.36%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[catenacyber]

Why did you come from the 6 separated commits in #15092 to one ?

See #15092 (comment) (I had missed this)

[l1gi]

Why did you come from the 6 separated commits in #15092 to one ?

See #15092 (comment) (I had missed this)

Because someone in previous ticket asked me to do that.

[catenacyber]

There was a misunderstanding :

It is better to have 6 commits as Victor said in #15092 (comment)

[l1gi]

Do I understand correctly, there is no action needed from my side right now, please?

[catenacyber]

Do I understand correctly, there is no action needed from my side right now, please?

Incorrect : please do a new PR with 6 commits as Victor said in #15092 (comment)

[l1gi]

Superseded by: #15576

I reopened this as a new PR with the original 6-commit series on top of current upstream main.

The new PR is:
#15576

[catenacyber]

Thanks, closing in favor of #15576