Skip to content

Comments

smb: fix SMB_COM_WRITE_ANDX record parser - v5#8938

Closed
b1tg wants to merge 2 commits intoOISF:masterfrom
b1tg:issue/6008-smb-v5
Closed

smb: fix SMB_COM_WRITE_ANDX record parser - v5#8938
b1tg wants to merge 2 commits intoOISF:masterfrom
b1tg:issue/6008-smb-v5

Conversation

@b1tg
Copy link
Contributor

@b1tg b1tg commented May 29, 2023

Bug: #6008

ticket:
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/6008

Previous PR: #8905

Changes from last PR:

  • update commit message
  • remove duplicated tests

SV_BRANCH=pr/1211

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 29, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #8938 (738bb4d) into master (afef35b) will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #8938      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.34%   82.38%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         969      969              
  Lines      273336   273350      +14     
==========================================
+ Hits       225090   225201     +111     
+ Misses      48246    48149      -97     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 64.86% <100.00%> (+0.10%) ⬆️
suricata-verify 60.47% <88.88%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
unittests 62.95% <95.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

This was referenced May 30, 2023
@victorjulien
Copy link
Member

When staged in #8941/#8942, our internal QA flagged several issues in private tests. We're working on investigating them. Thanks for your patience.

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

@ct0br0 Can we run QA on this PR ?
To me, the changes look correct

@ct0br0
Copy link

ct0br0 commented Jun 2, 2023

What changed? I got the pcaps the other day and I think I saw you say they checked out. Can run but expect a false failure.

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

What changed?

Nothing, but there is no QA report in this GitHub PR (there was one on the newt branch)

@ct0br0
Copy link

ct0br0 commented Jun 2, 2023

No, there won't be. Since it is not a team member it will not go into the automated pipeline and qa-bot won't comment on this PR

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

Ok I did not know this :-)

@victorjulien victorjulien mentioned this pull request Jun 5, 2023
@victorjulien
Copy link
Member

Merged in #8965, thanks a lot for this fix!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants