-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updates Result Summaries #219
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps on Monday you can walk me through how the values in TradeFlows.csv are derived. Takes me a bit too much time right now to figure that out:)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we also add domestic and international transmission flows as separate entries? E.g. NODE_1
and NODE_2
could be CANXX
, 'USAXX' and 'CANXX', 'CANXX' for domestic flows. Note that for domestic flows negative values should first be turned positive and summed after.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Totally! This remained unchanged from how they were calculated before (ie. it used @abhishek0208's implementation)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we also add capacities at the country level (simple sum by tech)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we also add domestic and international transmission capacities as separate entries? E.g. FROM
and TO
could be 'CANXX`, 'USAXX' and 'CANXX', 'CANXX' for domestic capacities. In the current setup international transmission capacities will already be reported at nodal level, but there are often multiple nodes that import/export from/to the same international node (e.g. multiple nodes between CAN & USA).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe both of these points have been solved in this commit now! I will do a double check that the international trading is working correctly in the morning with a more robust example.
@trevorb1 This looks good! Two fixes should be made first I think (changing storage exclusions dynamically and making sure that RENEWABLE filters are in line) with some other suggestions provided (e.g. country level results). |
Thanks for the detailed feedback, @maartenbrinkerink! I believe most of your comments have now been addressed! One note, I (sorta) reverted your change of adding |
@trevorb1 I can't run the workflow at the moment. For the below this can be solved by adding them to
|
Thanks for flagging those errors, @maartenbrinkerink! I have:
|
Okay. I feel like this should work now!
|
Description
Migrates from the the old results summary to new format; does not change the logic. Replaces the old node discount cost with updated result from otoole.
NOTE: We can not merge this until otoole 1.1.4 is released.Issue Ticket Number
na
Documentation
na