-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
chore: upgrade Greenwood v0.33.0 #211
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
thescientist13
wants to merge
14
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
chore/upgrade-greenwood-v0.33.0
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
✅ Deploy Preview for super-tapioca-5987ce ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
56 tasks
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
2 tasks
d1f6010
to
9d508a7
Compare
1 task
getting a build error in the CSS Modules plugin (again...) SyntaxError [Error]: Unterminated string in JSON at position 8192 (line 1 column 8193)
at JSON.parse (<anonymous>)
at getCssModulesMap (file:///Users/owenbuckley/Workspace/project-evergreen/www.greenwoodjs.dev/node_modules/@greenwood/plugin-css-modules/src/index.js:29:26)
at ScanForCssModulesResource.shouldIntercept (file:///Users/owenbuckley/Workspace/project-evergreen/www.greenwoodjs.dev/node_modules/@greenwood/plugin-css-modules/src/index.js:194:27)
at getCustomLoaderResponse (file:///Users/owenbuckley/Workspace/project-evergreen/www.greenwoodjs.dev/node_modules/@greenwood/cli/src/loader.js:71:49)
at async load (file:///Users/owenbuckley/Workspace/project-evergreen/www.greenwoodjs.dev/node_modules/@greenwood/cli/src/loader.js:113:28)
at async nextLoad (node:internal/modules/esm/hooks:748:22)
at async Hooks.load (node:internal/modules/esm/hooks:385:20)
at async handleMessage (node:internal/modules/esm/worker:199:18) |
On top of the CSS Modules issue, this project will also suffer from ProjectEvergreen/greenwood#1558 |
2 tasks
2865b0b
to
a6f9312
Compare
Not sure if this is also related to the concurrency refactor, but I think we need more ThreadPools or something? (node:85019) MaxListenersExceededWarning: Possible EventEmitter memory leak detected. 11 Symbol(kWorkerFreedEvent) listeners added to [WorkerPool]. MaxListeners is 10. Use emitter.setMaxListeners() to increase limit
(Use `node --trace-warnings ...` to show where the warning was created) |
5 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related Issue
ProjectEvergreen/greenwood#1499
Summary of Changes
TODO
@import
s #214<title>
merging when using active content greenwood#1526Not sure if this is also related to the concurrency refactor, but I think we need more ThreadPools or something?