docs: add feature flag fail-modes reference and consolidate ADRs#832
docs: add feature flag fail-modes reference and consolidate ADRs#832
Conversation
maskarb
commented
Mar 6, 2026
- Add fail-modes.md documenting which evaluation methods fail open vs closed, where each is used, and the full evaluation precedence
- Move unleash ADR from components/backend/docs/adr/ to docs/internal/adr/ as ADR-0007 (0006 was already taken)
- Update ADR status from Proposed to Accepted, add sections for fail modes, model/runner feature gates, and flag sync at startup
- Fix incorrect "all flags disabled" claims in README and unleash guide to distinguish fail-closed (general) vs fail-open (model) behavior
- Update unleash guide with workspace override docs, full API endpoint list, Unleash server UI access instructions, and correct navigation path for the workspace feature flags panel
- Fix stale relative links in runner README and ADR
- Add fail-modes.md documenting which evaluation methods fail open vs closed, where each is used, and the full evaluation precedence - Move unleash ADR from components/backend/docs/adr/ to docs/internal/adr/ as ADR-0007 (0006 was already taken) - Update ADR status from Proposed to Accepted, add sections for fail modes, model/runner feature gates, and flag sync at startup - Fix incorrect "all flags disabled" claims in README and unleash guide to distinguish fail-closed (general) vs fail-open (model) behavior - Update unleash guide with workspace override docs, full API endpoint list, Unleash server UI access instructions, and correct navigation path for the workspace feature flags panel - Fix stale relative links in runner README and ADR Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude Code ReviewSummaryThis is a docs-only PR that consolidates ADRs into a single canonical location ( Issues by SeverityBlocker IssuesNone Critical IssuesNone Major IssuesNone Minor Issues1. Duplicate step number in File: The "Using the Admin UI" numbered list has two step 2. Hard-coded line numbers in File: The tables reference exact line numbers such as Positive Highlights
Recommendations
Reviewed by Claude Code using repository standards from 🔍 View AI decision process (logs available for 90 days) 📋 View memory system files loaded (click to expand)What Amber Loaded for Code ReviewAmber automatically loaded these repository standards from the memory system:
Impact: This review used your repository's specific code quality standards, security patterns, and best practices from the memory system (PRs #359, #360) - not just generic code review guidelines. |
🚦 Review Queue StatusThis PR has 1 blocker(s) preventing merge:
Action NeededAddress minor formatting issues (duplicate step 4, line number staleness caveat) or merge as-is This comment is posted by the Review Queue workflow. It will update when blockers change. |