Update project's metadata

[diegoferigo]

• Move content from setup.cfg to pyproject.toml
• Update the README file.

Note: I verified that the METADATA has not been altered.

@flferretti this PR should also fix the missing description in PyPI.

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://jaxsim--193.org.readthedocs.build//193/

[diegoferigo]

@flferretti any reason why ruff started failing from this PR?

[flferretti]

@flferretti any reason why ruff started failing from this PR?

The check B905 has been restored in 73e62b4, which was part of #186. We can either fix those with one command using ruff check --fix or restore the ignore in pyproject.toml

[diegoferigo]

@flferretti any reason why ruff started failing from this PR?

The check B905 has been restored in 73e62b4, which was part of #186. We can either fix those with one command using ruff check --fix or restore the ignore in pyproject.toml

Mmh ok, and just to have a better picture, why the CI in that PR didn't fail after restoring the checks?

[flferretti]

Mmh ok, and just to have a better picture, why the CI in that PR didn't fail after restoring the checks?

The ruff action should check all the files, including the one in the tests folder. I'm not sure why it did pass, but I can check

[diegoferigo]

Mmh ok, and just to have a better picture, why the CI in that PR didn't fail after restoring the checks?

The ruff action should check all the files, including the one in the tests folder. I'm not sure why it did pass, but I can check

What's strange is that also #187 is now passing, and both that and this PR are based on the current main. Somehow, it seems that the changes of setup.cfg and pyproject.toml altered the ruff configuration even if its configuration has not been touched.

[flferretti]

Mmh ok, and just to have a better picture, why the CI in that PR didn't fail after restoring the checks?

The ruff action should check all the files, including the one in the tests folder. I'm not sure why it did pass, but I can check

What's strange is that also #187 is now passing, and both that and this PR are based on the current main. Somehow, it seems that the changes of setup.cfg and pyproject.toml altered the ruff configuration even if its configuration has not been touched.

I guess I found the reason. Probably before ruff could not infer on the target python version in the pyproject.toml, which defaults to py38, and the strict argument has been introduced in py310 with PEP 618. For this reason, the B905 check was just ignored

[diegoferigo]

@flferretti thanks for the explanation, it makes sense. I just fixed by passing strict=True to all our zip calls.

[flferretti]

Thanks Diego, LGTM! I added a couple comments