Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[fix][doc]Correcting spelling mistakes in the pulsar-broker module #23758

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

daziz
Copy link
Contributor

@daziz daziz commented Dec 19, 2024

Fixes #xyz

Main Issue: #xyz

PIP: #xyz

Motivation

Modifications

Verifying this change

  • Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.

(Please pick either of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

  • Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)
  • Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

If the box was checked, please highlight the changes

  • Dependencies (add or upgrade a dependency)
  • The public API
  • The schema
  • The default values of configurations
  • The threading model
  • The binary protocol
  • The REST endpoints
  • The admin CLI options
  • The metrics
  • Anything that affects deployment

Documentation

  • doc
  • doc-required
  • doc-not-needed
  • doc-complete

Matching PR in forked repository

PR in forked repository:

@github-actions github-actions bot added the doc Your PR contains doc changes, no matter whether the changes are in markdown or code files. label Dec 19, 2024
@@ -3140,7 +3140,7 @@ public void checkGC() {
* "replicator.producer" to a null value.
* Race condition: task 1 will get a NPE when it tries to send messages using the variable
* "replicator.producer", because task 2 will set this variable to "null".
* TODO Create a seperated PR to fix it.
* TODO Create a separated PR to fix it.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* TODO Create a separated PR to fix it.
* TODO Create a separate PR to fix it.

@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ protected void verifyPartitionsNeverCreated(String topicNameStr) throws Exceptio
} catch (Exception ex) {
// If the namespace bundle has not been loaded yet, it means no non-persistent topic was created. So
// this behavior is also correct.
// This error is not expected, a seperated PR is needed to fix this issue.
// This error is not expected, a separated PR is needed to fix this issue.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// This error is not expected, a separated PR is needed to fix this issue.
// This error is not expected, a separate PR is needed to fix this issue.

@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ protected void verifyNonPartitionedTopicNeverCreated(String topicNameStr) throws
} catch (Exception ex) {
// If the namespace bundle has not been loaded yet, it means no non-persistent topic was created. So
// this behavior is also correct.
// This error is not expected, a seperated PR is needed to fix this issue.
// This error is not expected, a separated PR is needed to fix this issue.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// This error is not expected, a separated PR is needed to fix this issue.
// This error is not expected, a separate PR is needed to fix this issue.

@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ private double getTotalCpuUsageForCGroup(double elapsedTimeSeconds) {
* </pre>
*
* Line is split in "words", filtering the first. The sum of all numbers give the amount of cpu cycles used this
* far. Real CPU usage should equal the sum substracting the idle cycles(that is idle+iowait), this would include
* far. Real CPU usage should equal the sum subtracting the idle cycles(that is idle+iowait), this would include
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* far. Real CPU usage should equal the sum subtracting the idle cycles(that is idle+iowait), this would include
* far. Real CPU usage should equal the sum after subtracting the idle cycles (that is idle+iowait), this would include

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc Your PR contains doc changes, no matter whether the changes are in markdown or code files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants