-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[AC-1650] [AC-1578] #3320
[AC-1650] [AC-1578] #3320
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SM changes look good.
No New Or Fixed Issues Found |
This will cause conflicts with #3164; also the improvements in that PR would avoid all the additional duplicated Plan objects here. I suggest either waiting until that is merged, or if you can't wait for that, can you please take over the subsequent reviews for #3164 as it will require additional changes if this is merged first. |
7818c99
to
f55a1d3
Compare
Thanks for the heads-up, @eliykat! We had planned to sneak this in before @cyprain-okeke's refactor, but now we need to make additional refactors that would further block his work. We're going to switch up the priorities to get his work in first, then rebase this on top of his work. Moving this to be a draft for now |
90783b6
to
f55a1d3
Compare
f55a1d3
to
3ebdd3f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks Good
2cc6178
to
8a937e3
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
…sync_SmNoneFreePlans_ReturnsNull
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks Good
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
# Conflicts: # src/Core/Constants.cs
…viously cached when feature flag was in a different state
6c140da
# Conflicts: # src/Core/Constants.cs
* Upgraded old 2019 plans to have the same features as 2020 and beyond * Removed redundant test and moved additional test cases to GetByOrgIdAsync_SmNoneFreePlans_ReturnsNull * Fixed issue where feature flag wasn't returning correct plans * Resolved issue where getting plans would return a value that LINQ previously cached when feature flag was in a different state --------- Co-authored-by: cyprain-okeke <[email protected]> # Conflicts: # src/Core/Constants.cs
* Upgraded old 2019 plans to have the same features as 2020 and beyond * Removed redundant test and moved additional test cases to GetByOrgIdAsync_SmNoneFreePlans_ReturnsNull * Fixed issue where feature flag wasn't returning correct plans * Resolved issue where getting plans would return a value that LINQ previously cached when feature flag was in a different state --------- Co-authored-by: cyprain-okeke <[email protected]> # Conflicts: # src/Core/Constants.cs
Type of change
Objective
Code changes
Before you submit
dotnet format --verify-no-changes
) (required)