-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 84
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Secrets endpoints #91
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ | ||
use super::WorkersSecret; | ||
|
||
use crate::framework::endpoint::{Endpoint, Method}; | ||
|
||
/// Create Secret | ||
/// https://api.cloudflare.com/#worker-create-secret | ||
pub struct CreateSecret<'a> { | ||
/// account id of owner of the script | ||
pub account_identifier: &'a str, | ||
/// the name of the script to attach the secret to | ||
pub script_name: &'a str, | ||
/// secert's contents | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. s/secert/secret Also all our comments elsewhere start with a capital, could you please change yours to be consistent? :) |
||
pub params: CreateSecretParams, | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl<'a> Endpoint<WorkersSecret, (), CreateSecretParams> for CreateSecret<'a> { | ||
fn method(&self) -> Method { | ||
Method::Put | ||
} | ||
fn path(&self) -> String { | ||
format!( | ||
"accounts/{}/workers/scripts/{}/secrets", | ||
self.account_identifier, self.script_name | ||
) | ||
} | ||
fn body(&self) -> Option<CreateSecretParams> { | ||
Some(self.params.clone()) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[derive(Serialize, Clone, Debug)] | ||
pub struct CreateSecretParams { | ||
/// the variable name of the secret that will be bound to the script | ||
pub name: String, | ||
/// the string value of the secret | ||
pub value: String, | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Are secret values strings or bytes? It feels like the latter would be more proper, no? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. yah bytes is probably better There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. except you can't precisely send a byte string in a json body... There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. You can serialize them as a string, however within the Rust type system it should still be bytes There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. That would force you to think about how that "string" should be deserialized. There isn't a single way to serialize bytes into a string. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This was giving me a hard time. Since it's not a blocker I filed an issue to prioritize later #98 |
||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm starting to think that these should be owned strings
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What do you mean by these? @ashleymichal how should we apply this suggestion?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Basically turn
&'a str
into aString
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we don't do this anywhere else :-\
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sssilver i actually started turning all of these
&'a str
's into&'static str
's elsewhere in wrangler. saves the requirement for lifetimes on all your structs and their methods. will illustrate in another pr.