Skip to content

renderer: kit pillar grounding — seat bounds min.y on floor (r6, #83)#1685

Merged
100yenadmin merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
kit-room-r6-grounding
Jul 22, 2026
Merged

renderer: kit pillar grounding — seat bounds min.y on floor (r6, #83)#1685
100yenadmin merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
kit-room-r6-grounding

Conversation

@100yenadmin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

One-line grounding fix in PlacePillar, box-validated before commit.

Bug (measured on the box, r5 build): achieved pillar world size was exactly on target (1.20, 4.00, 1.20) — the r5 measured-multiplier works — but every pillar sat at pos.y=-1.98 with world bounds -1.99..+2.01: half the column underground, rendering as a short stub.

Root cause: the seating formula pivotOffset.y - b1.min.y double-counts the bounds centre for base-pivot meshes (Synty pillar pivot is at its base → centre.y=+2.0 after scaling → pos.y=-2.0). The tomb reads correctly only because its pivot is centred.

Fix: ground on min.y alone: position.y - b1.min.y.

Box verification (same session): post-fix probe reports all 4 pillars minY=0.00 maxY=4.00 sizeY=4.00; capture kit_crypt_20260722T1538Z shows four full-height brick columns at the quadrant positions. Round log on #83.

PlacePillar's y-term (pivotOffset.y - b1.min.y) double-counts the bounds
centre for base-pivot meshes: Synty pillars (pivot at base, centre.y=+2.0
after scaling) landed at pos.y=-1.98 with world bounds -1.99..2.01 — half
the column underground, reading as a short stub despite achieved size
(1.20, 4.00, 1.20) being exactly on target.

Fix: ground on min.y alone (position.y - b1.min.y). Box-verified live:
all 4 pillars now minY=0.00 maxY=4.00; capture kit_crypt_20260722T1538Z
shows full-height columns. Part of #83 / #84 navigation-truth spike.
@100yenadmin
100yenadmin enabled auto-merge (squash) July 22, 2026 15:39
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your recent review volume is higher than typical usage, so adaptive limits are currently applied.

Next review available in: 50 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: f1a2d427-ec5e-4693-8503-211c78d46c14

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5d357db and 2cd3113.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • extensions/renderers/unity/scripts/build_room_kit.cs
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch kit-room-r6-grounding

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

qa/registration_score.py refuses non-contract sizes (its projection is
defined in the 1344x768 frame); the 2560x1600 review render alone could
not be scored. One capture op now writes both files.
@100yenadmin
100yenadmin merged commit cceabaa into main Jul 22, 2026
29 of 30 checks passed
@100yenadmin
100yenadmin deleted the kit-room-r6-grounding branch July 22, 2026 15:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant