Open
Conversation
Contributor
Contributor
Author
|
Marking as draft until Chisel's been updated to not emit implicitly clocked past intrinsics. |
14 tasks
Contributor
Author
Fixed in Chisel as of cb507359fad35be779d28acc2ad910be0bb21172 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The implicit clocking of ltl.past complicates lowering as it leaves you having to infer the op's clocking behaviour from context. Since as of #10370 we no longer create any PastOps without an explicit clock, this makes the clock operand mandatory avoid implicit clocking behaviour. This requires a few changes to the FIRRTL intrinsic too - please let me know if that's likely to cause any problems.
Note that this leaves
assume-first-clockin LTLToCore redundant - I'll remove it in a follow-up since it seems that the other implicitly clocked ops are also shifting to an explicit model too (e.g. #9392 and follow-ups)