-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Configuring auditing with timescaledb. #217
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2a0293b
Configuring auditing with timescaledb.
Gerrit91 546dde2
Merge branch 'master' into auditing-timescaledb
Gerrit91 3f94bef
Allow configuring both audit backends.
Gerrit91 7a74d99
Update.
Gerrit91 73680fe
Remove override.
Gerrit91 43d8b92
Merge branch 'master' into auditing-timescaledb
Gerrit91 67c5e12
Cleanup.
Gerrit91 2486c44
Cleanup.
Gerrit91 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@ | ||
--- | ||
auditing_timescaledb_storage_size: 10Gi | ||
auditing_timescaledb_resources: {} | ||
|
||
auditing_meili_storage_size: 10Gi | ||
auditing_meili_resources: {} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's not possible to toggle this role depending on a value switch like an environment variable, right?
If not: I think it would make sense for the mini-lab to include both backends for the mini-lab.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's now possible to use both backends. By default it's TimescaleDB, but backends can be toggled using the variables
metal_auditing_timescaledb_enabled
andmetal_auditing_meili_enabled
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I really vote for only one backend, we should simplify not complicate things. If we are not convinced with the existing solution we should get rid of it completely. Same applies for the extra code in the metal-api
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After we gained confidence we can decide if we want to throw out one. Having both options during transition phase is I think helpful. And there will also be a Splunk backend I hope soon, which is not searchable, so in general it's good to have everything prepared for another backend.