Skip to content

Conversation

@dlunde
Copy link
Member

@dlunde dlunde commented Oct 20, 2025

Issue Summary

The RegMask copy constructor is currently non-explicit. We should make it explicit so that we do not unintentionally copy register masks.

Additionally, we currently overload operator= in RegMask to do a deep copy. It is preferable to use an explicit named function instead, according to the HotSpot coding style.

Changeset

  • Make the RegMask copy constructor explicit.
  • Fix compilation errors as a result of the now explicit constructor. Specifically, the methods Matcher::divI_proj_mask, Matcher::modI_proj_mask, Matcher::divL_proj_mask, and Matcher::modL_proj_mask all use implicit copy construction (likely unintended). Change the methods to return const RegMask& instead of RegMask and correspondingly change the return value from RegMask() to RegMask::Empty on some platforms.
  • Rename the old method RegMask::copy to RegMask::assignFrom to better describe its functionality, and make it public instead of private.
  • Delete RegMask copy assignment (operator=) and change all uses to the named function assignFrom instead.
  • Fix various syntax issues at lines touched by the changeset.

Testing

  • GitHub Actions
  • tier1 to tier4 (and additional Oracle-internal testing) on Windows x64, Linux x64, Linux aarch64, macOS x64, and macOS aarch64.

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8370031: Make RegMask copy constructor explicit and replace RegMask operator= with named function (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27891/head:pull/27891
$ git checkout pull/27891

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27891
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27891/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27891

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27891

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27891.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 20, 2025

👋 Welcome back dlunden! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 20, 2025

@dlunde This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8370031: Make RegMask copy constructor explicit and replace RegMask operator= with named function

Reviewed-by: mhaessig, rcastanedalo

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 16 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8370031 8370031: Make RegMask copy constructor explicit and replace RegMask operator= with named function Oct 20, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 20, 2025

@dlunde The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 20, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 20, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@mhaessig mhaessig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for cleaning this up, @dlunde. Your changes look good to me.

Copy link
Contributor

@robcasloz robcasloz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 21, 2025
@dlunde
Copy link
Member Author

dlunde commented Oct 21, 2025

Thanks for the reviews @mhaessig and @robcasloz! Sanity pre-integration tests look good, so integrating now.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 21, 2025

Going to push as commit 2af4d20.
Since your change was applied there have been 20 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 21, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 21, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 21, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 21, 2025

@dlunde Pushed as commit 2af4d20.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-compiler [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants