Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Wrap service account error to hide k8s error #1698

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2025

Conversation

rashmi43
Copy link
Contributor

@rashmi43 rashmi43 commented Feb 4, 2025

Description

Wrap the service account not does not exist error message

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

@rashmi43 rashmi43 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 4, 2025 12:45
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 4e60ab7
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/olmv1/deploys/67a591d269f1d20008da5b5e
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1698--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 46.15385% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.02%. Comparing base (46cec30) to head (4e60ab7).
Report is 15 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
internal/authentication/tokengetter.go 0.00% 6 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1698      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.47%   68.02%   +0.54%     
==========================================
  Files          59       59              
  Lines        5003     5004       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         3376     3404      +28     
+ Misses       1380     1358      -22     
+ Partials      247      242       -5     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 52.92% <0.00%> (-0.46%) ⬇️
unit 55.27% <46.15%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@azych azych left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

internal/authentication/tokengetter.go Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/controllers/clusterextension_controller_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/controllers/suite_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 5, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 5, 2025
camilamacedo86
camilamacedo86 previously approved these changes Feb 6, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is great 🥇
Rocket 🚀

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 dismissed their stale review February 6, 2025 18:05

Lets address the latest nits raised first

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 self-requested a review February 6, 2025 18:05
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems good to go !!!
Great work 🥇

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 7, 2025
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 7, 2025
Merged via the queue into operator-framework:main with commit 1af98d0 Feb 7, 2025
21 of 22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants