-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 215
tests: moved/added general tests to spec #696
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tests: moved/added general tests to spec #696
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Jan Kowalleck <[email protected]>
| "expected_failure": false, | ||
| "expected_failure_reason": null | ||
| }, | ||
| { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
moved to specification-test
| "expected_failure_reason": "Should fail to parse a PURL from invalid purl input" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "description": "checks for invalid qualifier keys", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
moved to specification-test
| "expected_failure_reason": null | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "description": "a name is required", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
moved to specification-test
| "expected_failure_reason": "Should fail to parse a PURL from invalid purl input" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "description": "a name is required", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
moved to specification-test
mjherzog
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Resolved the conflict with changes from #694 by accepting both changes
johnmhoran
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 👍
since i came up with the original idea to split the test suite(#428)
so that implementations can properly test for the spec and types,
and i've spent a lot of time to properly split the actual needed spec tests, which were broadly ignored in the #514,
here are the "forgotten" and "wrong-categorized" tests.
reviewing all original test cases took me multiple days the last time,
unfortunately, my work was ignored.
I don't have the time to do this again. feel free to do it this time, i am just leaving this PR as a starter.