Skip to content

chore(deps): update linters (non-major) #3765

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
openshift-merge-bot merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2025
Merged

chore(deps): update linters (non-major) #3765

openshift-merge-bot merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2025

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 27, 2025 •
edited
Loading

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) 8.47.0 -> 8.49.0 age confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) 8.47.0 -> 8.49.0 age confidence
eslint-plugin-playwright 2.3.0 -> 2.4.0 age confidence
typescript-eslint (source) 8.47.0 -> 8.49.0 age confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v8.49.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin: use Intl.Segmenter instead of graphemer (#​11804)
🩹 Fixes
  • deps: update dependency prettier to v3.7.2 (#​11820)
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.48.1

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [restrict-template-expressions] check base types in allow list (#​11764, #​11759)
  • eslint-plugin: honor ignored base types on generic classes (#​11767)
  • eslint-plugin: [consistent-type-exports] check value flag before resolving alias (#​11769)
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.48.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin: [no-redundant-type-constituents] use assignability checking for redundancy checks (#​10744)
🩹 Fixes
  • typescript-estree: disallow binding patterns in parameter properties (#​11760)
  • eslint-plugin: [consistent-generic-constructors] ignore when constructor is typed array (#​10477)
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v8.49.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.48.1

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.48.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

playwright-community/eslint-plugin-playwright (eslint-plugin-playwright)

v2.4.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • missing-playwright-await: prevent infinite recursion in checkValidity (9ce346d)
Features
typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (typescript-eslint)

v8.49.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.48.1

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.48.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team November 27, 2025 21:33
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from albarbaro and zdrapela November 27, 2025 21:33
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 27, 2025

Hi @renovate[bot]. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a github.com member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 27, 2025

The image is available at:

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from c9db91b to 9bd4e4c Compare November 28, 2025 11:56
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 9bd4e4c to 6488bd7 Compare November 28, 2025 15:04
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 6488bd7 to 77e07cf Compare November 28, 2025 16:25
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 77e07cf to 87af377 Compare November 28, 2025 17:18
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 28, 2025

The image is available at:

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 28, 2025

The image is available at:

@kim-tsao
Copy link
Member

kim-tsao commented Nov 28, 2025

/ok-to-test

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 87af377 to 8231289 Compare November 30, 2025 09:53
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update linters (non-major) to v8.48.0 chore(deps): update linters (non-major) Nov 30, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 30, 2025

The image is available at:

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 8231289 to ffc346e Compare November 30, 2025 12:32
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 30, 2025

The image is available at:

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from ffc346e to 5a8b871 Compare December 1, 2025 03:40
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2025

The image is available at:

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 7f94c2a to 652c417 Compare December 9, 2025 19:55
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 652c417 to f44ad8e Compare December 9, 2025 20:00
@kim-tsao
Copy link
Member

kim-tsao commented Dec 9, 2025

Looks like the new version of prettier is causing lint failures. I will work on a separate PR to fix this

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2025

The image is available at:

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from f44ad8e to 7e6cac0 Compare December 10, 2025 08:15
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 10, 2025

The image is available at:

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 7e6cac0 to cf1ece4 Compare December 10, 2025 17:15
@kim-tsao kim-tsao mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2025
Merged
5 tasks
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 10, 2025

The image is available at:

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from cf1ece4 to f019ce2 Compare December 11, 2025 08:54
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from f019ce2 to 13c0610 Compare December 11, 2025 15:51
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 11, 2025

The image is available at:

@renovate
chore(deps): update linters (non-major)
f2e8dc6 
Signed-off-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 13c0610 to f2e8dc6 Compare December 11, 2025 17:12
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 11, 2025

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@kim-tsao
Copy link
Member

kim-tsao commented Dec 11, 2025

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Dec 11, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 11, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kim-tsao

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit b7fd410 into main Dec 11, 2025
22 checks passed
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot deleted the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch December 11, 2025 20:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@albarbaro albarbaro Awaiting requested review from albarbaro

@zdrapela zdrapela Awaiting requested review from zdrapela

Assignees

@kim-tsao kim-tsao

Labels

approved kind/dependency upgrade lgtm ok-to-test

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@kim-tsao