Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add tests for memory leaks #106
Add tests for memory leaks #106
Changes from 3 commits
6346e99
90d8530
fc3e952
ba3f080
07b2680
cd1ff09
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is worth something, but for catching leaks what we care about is not the high water mark but how much RAM is still used after all tests are done...right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, I was trying to figure out how we can assert that no allocations were leaked but wasn't able to immediately find anything, I see this PR which looks like what we need? Maybe I'll add a ping of @pablogsal in case there's something I'm missing from the docs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sethmlarson Okay yeah, that looks like the right place for it. We can follow up and add it once that PR lands.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We are still iterating a bit over thar PR because is quite difficult to isolate from weird one-off allocations that the interpreter does and caches. Stay tuned. Meanwhile you can use the high watermark limit + a lot of iterations of the test as a proxy if you want