-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 726
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
storage: Add APIs for RawKV GC #4937
Conversation
Signed-off-by: AmoebaProtozoa <[email protected]>
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
/cc @nolouch @AndreMouche |
Signed-off-by: AmoebaProtozoa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: AmoebaProtozoa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: AmoebaProtozoa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: AmoebaProtozoa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: AmoebaProtozoa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM~
@pingyu: Thanks for your review. The bot only counts approvals from reviewers and higher roles in list, but you're still welcome to leave your comments. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
Signed-off-by: David <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rest LGTM
Signed-off-by: David <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David <[email protected]>
} | ||
|
||
// KeySpaceServiceSafePointPath returns the path of given service's service safe point. | ||
// Path: /key_space/gc_safepoint/{space_id}/service/{service_id} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we know the endpoint types from service_id
? such as it's from tidb
, raw_kv client
, cdc
or others?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we can tell by service_id
alone,
for example, both TiDB
and raw_kv's gc_worker
may use gc_worker
as their service_id
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So... Is it different in space_id? like cdc_xxx
, tidb_xxx
, client_xxxx
. I would like to know who use the path.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
currently, we use spaceID
to differentiate key spaces, things like
default_rawkv
, default_txnkv
, default_tidb
serviceID
is used to identify the specific service under that KeySpace
, like
cdc
, br
, etc.
tidb cdc
and rawkv cdc
may have the same serviceID
but different spaceID
s
rawkv cdc
and rawkv br
have the same spaceID
but different serviceID
s
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4937 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 75.57% 75.43% -0.14%
==========================================
Files 307 308 +1
Lines 30201 30281 +80
==========================================
+ Hits 22823 22842 +19
- Misses 5396 5453 +57
- Partials 1982 1986 +4
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. better merge it to master after release-6.1 checkout.
Signed-off-by: David <[email protected]>
Could we merge this PR? |
We can merge it now, cc @AndreMouche |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
/merge |
@nolouch: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 769a40b
|
Signed-off-by: AmoebaProtozoa [email protected]
What problem does this PR solve?
Add APIs for RawKV GC (storage part of #4866).
Issue Number: ref #4865
RFC: tikv/rfcs#90
What is changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Code changes
No
No
No
Side effects
No
Release note