Update nscplugin, sbt-scala-native to 0.5.1

[typelevel-steward]

About this PR

📦 Updates

• org.scala-native:nscplugin
• org.scala-native:sbt-scala-native

from 0.4.17 to 0.5.1

📜 GitHub Release Notes - Version Diff

Usage

✅ Please merge!

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

⚙ Adjust future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "org.scala-native" } ]

Or, add this to slow down future updates of this dependency:

dependencyOverrides = [{
  pullRequests = { frequency = "30 days" },
  dependency = { groupId = "org.scala-native" }
}]

^{labels: library-update, early-semver-major, semver-spec-minor, commit-count:1}

[satorg]

Seems blocked by typelevel/discipline#446,

[satorg]

+ Update scalacheck to 1.18.0
+ Update discipline-core to 1.7.0
+ Update discipline-munit to 2.0.0-M4

[satorg]

Ok, the checks are passing now 🎉
@armanbilge @mpilquist could you verify that tlVersionIntroduced and other settings are properly re-aligned here in the PR please? Thank you!

[armanbilge]

Can we take a pass through the project and remove all the weird stuff we did b/c Scala Native didn't support multi-threading? For example this should no longer be necessary:

cats/tests/native/src/test/scala/cats/native/tests/FutureSuite.scala

Lines 40 to 41 in dfd9559

	// TODO: We shouldn't do this! See: https://github.com/scala-js/scala-js/issues/2102
	implicit private object SynchronousExecutor extends ExecutionContextExecutor {

Probably we can now share that suite between JVM and Native.

Thanks!

[kapunga]

Can we take a pass through the project and remove all the weird stuff we did b/c Scala Native didn't support multi-threading? For example this should no longer be necessary:

cats/tests/native/src/test/scala/cats/native/tests/FutureSuite.scala

Lines 40 to 41 in dfd9559

	// TODO: We shouldn't do this! See: https://github.com/scala-js/scala-js/issues/2102
	implicit private object SynchronousExecutor extends ExecutionContextExecutor {

Probably we can now share that suite between JVM and Native.

Thanks!

Wasn't sure if anyone was working on this so I went ahead and opened a PR: #4601

[danicheg]

CI is constantly failing with

[error] Test runner interrupted by fatal signal 11
[warn] Force close java.lang.RuntimeException: Process /home/runner/work/cats/cats/tests/native/target/scala-2.13/cats-tests-test finished with non-zero value 139 (0x8b)

[mzuehlke]

In the meantime there is a 2.0.0 release: https://github.com/typelevel/discipline-munit/releases/tag/v2.0.0

[satorg]

That's right. However, I think it wouldn't hurt if we address it in a separate PR to avoid stuffing up this one.

It would be perfect, if @typelevel-steward could wake up and create such a PR for us.

[danicheg]

Shall we publish a fresh release?

[mpilquist]

@armanbilge and I were discussing a release plan yesterday on Discord. He suggested a Cats 2.11.0 release against Native 0.4 and then an immediate Cats 2.12.0 release against Native 0.5. To do so, we'll have to temporarily downgrade native on main branch.

[armanbilge]

To do so, we'll have to temporarily downgrade native on main branch.

Not necessarily. We can tag 3c7474b (the commit prior to merging this PR) as v2.11.0. The v2.11.0 release will be missing any PRs that were merged after, such as #4602.

[satorg]

The v2.11.0 release will be missing any PRs that were merged after

Actually, there were exactly two of them:

• Update discipline-munit to 2.0.0 #4605 followed by
• Add flatMapOrKeep to Monad #4602

[armanbilge]

Right, but #4605 would be unable to land in v2.11.0 anyway :)

[sideeffffect]

Hello good people here, may I ask what did you do to fix/workaround the problem with

finished with non-zero value 139

#4585 (review)
?