Add configuration files for funding, linters, workflows, and issue templates.#4
Add configuration files for funding, linters, workflows, and issue templates.#4terabytesoftw merged 5 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds repository configuration, CI linting, community docs, and templates: a funding file, Actionlint config, a super-linter workflow, CODE_OF_CONDUCT, issue/PR templates, updated .gitignore, and a small profile README formatting tweak. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Poem
Pre-merge checks✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Fix all issues with AI Agents
In @ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug-report.yml:
- Line 9: Update the security advisory URL in ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug-report.yml so
it points to a specific project repository instead of the organization-level
.github repo; replace
"https://github.com/ui-awesome/.github/security/advisories/new" with
"https://github.com/ui-awesome/<project-name>/security/advisories/new" (or
alternatively change the link to the org security policy that instructs
reporters which project to file in) so the template directs reporters to the
correct per-project advisory endpoint.
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md (1)
1-102: LGTM! Well-structured Code of Conduct.The Code of Conduct is comprehensive and properly adapted from Contributor Covenant v2.1. It covers all essential aspects including standards, enforcement, and guidelines.
The static analysis tool flagged two minor style suggestions:
- Line 5: "in order to keep" could be simplified to "to keep"
- Line 21: Consider varying the word "comments"
These are purely stylistic and completely optional.
ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug-report.yml (2)
18-29: Consider making version fields required.Package version and PHP version are optional fields, but this information is typically essential for reproducing and troubleshooting bug reports. Without version details, maintainers may need to request this information in follow-up comments.
🔎 Proposed change to make version fields required
- type: input id: package-version attributes: label: Package version description: Specify the exact package version you're using placeholder: "0.1.0" + validations: + required: true - type: input id: php-version attributes: label: PHP version description: Specify the exact PHP version you're using (run `php -v` to check) placeholder: "8.5.0" + validations: + required: true
1-1: Optional: Remove leading empty line.The empty first line is unnecessary in YAML files and can be removed for cleaner formatting.
🔎 Proposed change
- --- name: 🐛 Bug Report.github/linters/actionlint.yml (1)
3-3: Consider supporting both.ymland.yamlextensions.The path pattern only matches
.ymlfiles. If your workflows might use the.yamlextension (which GitHub Actions also supports), this pattern won't apply the ignore rules to those files.🔎 Proposed change to support both extensions
paths: - .github/workflows/**/*.yml: + .github/workflows/**/*.{yml,yaml}: ignore:Note: Verify that actionlint supports this glob pattern syntax. If not, you may need to add a separate entry for
.yamlfiles.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.github/FUNDING.yml.github/linters/actionlint.yml.github/workflows/linter.ymlCODE_OF_CONDUCT.mdISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug-report.ymlISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature-request.ymlPULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
[style] ~5-~5: Consider a more concise word here.
Context: ...rs and maintainers of this project, and in order to keep community open and welcoming, we a...
(IN_ORDER_TO_PREMIUM)
[style] ~21-~21: Try using a synonym here to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...ind - Trolling, insulting or derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks - Pu...
(COMMENT_REMARK)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: linter / Super Linter
- GitHub Check: linter / Super Linter
🔇 Additional comments (5)
PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (1)
1-8: LGTM!The PR template is well-structured with clear fields for capturing essential metadata about pull requests.
.github/FUNDING.yml (1)
1-2: LGTM!The funding configuration is correctly formatted for GitHub's funding metadata.
ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature-request.yml (1)
1-11: LGTM!The feature request template is properly structured with appropriate fields and validation.
.github/workflows/linter.yml (1)
15-17: External workflow reference is valid and accessible.The reusable workflow
yii2-framework/actions/.github/workflows/super-linter.yml@v1exists and is properly accessible. The@v1tag is valid, with releases v1.0.0, v1.0.1, and tag v1 available in the repository. No changes needed..github/linters/actionlint.yml (1)
4-7: These alias node suppressions appear unnecessary and should be removed or documented.The workflow files contain no YAML anchors or aliases, so these suppressions are not addressing any actual linting warnings. All workflow YAML is valid and parses correctly. Unless these suppressions work around a known actionlint false positive that may return in the future, they should be removed to keep the configuration clean.
…urity advisory link.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Fix all issues with AI Agents
In @ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug-report.yml:
- Line 9: Replace the literal "<project-name>" placeholder in the security
advisory URL on the "⚠️ DON'T CREATE SECURITY ISSUE..." line: either swap the
placeholder for a valid repository name so the link points to a working security
advisory page, or remove the specific URL entirely and replace it with a generic
instruction telling users to file security issues in the appropriate repository
(e.g., "file security advisories in the repository for the affected project or
via your organization's security advisories flow"). Ensure the updated text
preserves the warning emoji and clearly directs reporters where to submit
security issues.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.gitignore (1)
10-10: Fix capitalization: "gitHub" → "GitHub".🔎 Proposed fix
-# gitHub copilot config (if present) +# GitHub copilot config (if present)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.gitignoreISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug-report.ymlprofile/README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: linter / Super Linter
- GitHub Check: linter / Super Linter
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.gitignore (3)
1-51: Ignore patterns are well-organized and comprehensive.The categorized structure with comments makes the file maintainable, and the patterns appropriately cover common development artifacts.
26-26: No action needed. This repository does not contain any Node.js tooling or packages (nopackage.jsonfile found), so thepackage-lock.jsonentry in.gitignoreis a precautionary placeholder. The exclusion does not affect reproducible builds since no Node.js builds are in use.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
8-8: This repository contains no PHP dependencies or Composer configuration files. Thecomposer.lockexclusion in.gitignorehas no practical impact, as there are nocomposer.jsonfiles or PHP tooling present. The entry appears to be part of a general-purpose.gitignoretemplate that includes conditional tooling entries.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
profile/README.md (1)
8-8: Formatting improvements enhance readability.The changes improve consistency (removing trailing period from Line 8), table alignment (Lines 20-23), and spacing throughout the document. These refinements make the README more polished and easier to read.
Also applies to: 14-14, 20-23, 28-28, 40-40, 46-46
ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug-report.yml (1)
10-29: Template structure is well-designed.The required description field, package version, and PHP version fields provide a good foundation for actionable bug reports. The PHP version field helpfully includes the
php -vhint.
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Chores
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.