Skip to content

Recognize eagerness option in PatchBased02Unified - #333606

Draft
Benjamin Steenhoek (bstee615) wants to merge 1 commit into
microsoft:mainfrom
bstee615:bstee615-recognize-optimized-eagerness
Draft

Recognize eagerness option in PatchBased02Unified#333606
Benjamin Steenhoek (bstee615) wants to merge 1 commit into
microsoft:mainfrom
bstee615:bstee615-recognize-optimized-eagerness

Conversation

@bstee615

@bstee615 Benjamin Steenhoek (bstee615) commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Recognize the eagernessPrompt option when it's provided with prompting strategy PatchBased02Unified

Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings August 31, 2026 18:00

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot review overview

Review tier: Balanced
Findings: None

What changed in this PR

Recognizes model-provided eagerness prompts for the optimized PatchBased02 strategy.

Changes:

  • Adds PatchBased02Unified to eagerness detection.
  • Tests enabled, absent, and unrelated-strategy behavior.
File Description
xtabPromptOptions.ts Recognizes unified PatchBased02 eagerness prompts.
xtabPromptOptions.spec.ts Covers detection and fallback behavior.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Treat the optimized PatchBased02 unified strategy as eagerness-aware when a model supplies an eagerness prompt, while preserving non-eagerness behavior for unrelated strategies.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@bstee615
Benjamin Steenhoek (bstee615) force-pushed the bstee615-recognize-optimized-eagerness branch from e2b9df0 to 6f8d0ee Compare August 31, 2026 18:12
@bstee615 Benjamin Steenhoek (bstee615) changed the title Recognize optimized PatchBased02 eagerness prompts Recognize eagerness option in PatchBased02Unified Aug 31, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants