Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hold Services in Object instead of an Array #10

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 9, 2023

Conversation

mrcwbr
Copy link
Owner

@mrcwbr mrcwbr commented Aug 8, 2023

  • refactored the internal service variable to an object instead of an array
  • removed the factory from the object after the instantiation
  • removed code duplications
  • updated several dev dependencies

… array

- removed the factory from the object after the instantiation
- removed code duplications
- updated several dev dependencies
@mrcwbr mrcwbr force-pushed the feature/hold_services_in_object branch from eaa6033 to b3dd1b8 Compare August 8, 2023 14:07
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Aug 9, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

96.3% 96.3% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

warning The version of Java (11.0.14.1) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it soon. Please update to at least Java 17.
Read more here

@mrcwbr mrcwbr merged commit fbe1e12 into master Aug 9, 2023
2 checks passed
@mrcwbr mrcwbr deleted the feature/hold_services_in_object branch August 9, 2023 05:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant