Skip to content

Conversation

@tldahlgren
Copy link
Contributor

There are a number of PRs pulled from spack/spack that were adding new packages under the old builtin directory structure. The goal here is to add a precheck that fails if any files are added under that structure.

@tldahlgren tldahlgren force-pushed the precheck_fail_on_old_builtin branch 2 times, most recently from 83a13c6 to b2f51c9 Compare July 8, 2025 23:20
@tldahlgren tldahlgren changed the title Precheck fail on old builtin [WIP] Precheck fail on old builtin Jul 8, 2025
@tldahlgren tldahlgren force-pushed the precheck_fail_on_old_builtin branch 4 times, most recently from f7a4417 to 9fbbf78 Compare July 9, 2025 01:39
@tldahlgren tldahlgren force-pushed the precheck_fail_on_old_builtin branch from c196d4a to 2f1b4fa Compare July 9, 2025 01:48
@tldahlgren tldahlgren changed the title [WIP] Precheck fail on old builtin Precheck fail on old builtin Jul 9, 2025
@tldahlgren tldahlgren marked this pull request as ready for review July 9, 2025 01:51
@tldahlgren tldahlgren requested a review from alecbcs July 9, 2025 17:07
@kwryankrattiger
Copy link
Contributor

Can you link the failing check?

@tldahlgren
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can you link the failing check?

Do you mean when it failed due to the addition of the test files?

@tldahlgren
Copy link
Contributor Author

tldahlgren commented Jul 9, 2025

Can you link the failing check?

Do you mean when it failed due to the addition of the test files?

If so, the failing run (before a couple of minor output tweaks on error output) is at https://github.com/spack/spack-packages/actions/runs/16158268521/job/45604955251#step:3:22.

Or, if you mean success output, that can be seen at https://github.com/spack/spack-packages/actions/runs/16158377716/job/45605249261?pr=526.

@alecbcs alecbcs self-assigned this Jul 9, 2025
@tldahlgren
Copy link
Contributor Author

Superseded by #542

@tldahlgren tldahlgren closed this Jul 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants