-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace deprecated spin_until_future_complete with spin_until_complete #306
Conversation
Due to change in RCLCPP - ros2/rclcpp#1874 Pull request |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we avoid unnecessary changes to re-format?
@fujitatomoya i will restore all formating base changes, they were due to some formatting plugin in IDE which did it implicitly (i did not check the diff good enough). it was not my intention |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For context, this connects to ros2/rclpy#919
Signed-off-by: Hubert Liberacki <[email protected]>
89c87b8
to
d65ad3e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM with passing CI!
@ros-pull-request-builder retest this please |
Unfortunately, this CI will most probably fail. This is because it did not include all the related PRs and there will be a missing include issue. Here is a CI run for all my changes in each connected PRs. |
@hliberacki thanks for the heads up. Indeed, CI will fail w/o ros2/rclpy#919. |
Since this is part of rclpy changes, it's blocked on ros2/rclpy#919 (review), but is not needed to fix CI after ros2/rclcpp#1874 was merged prematurely. |
I've opened #396 to replace this PR. |
This can be closed, see #396 (comment) |
Signed-off-by: Hubert Liberacki [email protected]