-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 297
Language japanese
Category: Asian Languages Script: Japanese
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Average Score | 🟡 7.2/10 |
| Accuracy | 7.6/10 |
| Fluency | 8.0/10 |
| Style | 6.9/10 |
| Total Tests | 48 |
| Best Model | gemma4:31b |
| Worst Model | gemma4:e2b |
| Model | Overall | Accuracy | Fluency | Style |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| gemma4:31b | 🟡 8.0 | 8.4 | 8.7 | 7.6 |
| claude-haiku-4.5 | 🟡 7.7 | 8.2 | 8.2 | 7.3 |
| gemma3:27b | 🟠 7.0 | 7.1 | 8.0 | 6.8 |
| gemma4:e2b | 🟠 6.3 | 6.6 | 7.0 | 6.0 |
Model: gemma3:27b Score: 🟡 8.5/10
View Translation
Original (English):
Now before the advent of the theory of relativity it had always tacitly been assumed in physics that the statement of time had an absolute significance, i.e. that it is independent of the state of motion of the body of reference. But we have just seen that this assumption is incompatible with the most natural definition of simultaneity; if we discard this assumption, then the conflict between the law of the propagation of light in vacuo and the principle of relativity (developed in Section VII)
Translation (Japanese):
相対性理論が登場する以前は、物理学において時間の記述は絶対的な意味を持つ、つまり、参照系の運動状態に依存しないということが、暗黙のうちに当然とされていた。しかし、我々はつい先ほど、この仮定が同時性の最も自然な定義と両立しないことを見た。この仮定を捨てるならば、真空中の光の伝播の法則と相対性原理（第VII節で展開した）との間の矛盾は解消されるのである。
Evaluator Feedback:
Accurate and fluent rendering; 'body of reference' as 参照系 is acceptable though 基準体 is more period-faithful. Parenthetical placement slightly awkward but natural.
Model: gemma4:31b Score: 🟡 8.5/10
View Translation
Original (English):
Now before the advent of the theory of relativity it had always tacitly been assumed in physics that the statement of time had an absolute significance, i.e. that it is independent of the state of motion of the body of reference. But we have just seen that this assumption is incompatible with the most natural definition of simultaneity; if we discard this assumption, then the conflict between the law of the propagation of light in vacuo and the principle of relativity (developed in Section VII)
Translation (Japanese):
さて、相対性理論が登場するまで、物理学においては、時間の記述は絶対的な意味を持つ、すなわち時間は基準となる物体の運動状態に依存しないということが常に暗黙の了解とされてきました。しかし、この仮定は、同時性の最も自然な定義と相容れないことが先ほど分かりました。もしこの仮定を捨てれば、真空中の光の伝播法則と相対性原理（第VII節で詳述）との間の矛盾は解消されることになります。
Evaluator Feedback:
Accurate, natural Japanese rendering. 'developed in' as 'detailed/expounded' is slight drift but acceptable. Register appropriate for popular science.
Model: claude-haiku-4.5 Score: 🟡 8.3/10
View Translation
Original (English):
Now before the advent of the theory of relativity it had always tacitly been assumed in physics that the statement of time had an absolute significance, i.e. that it is independent of the state of motion of the body of reference. But we have just seen that this assumption is incompatible with the most natural definition of simultaneity; if we discard this assumption, then the conflict between the law of the propagation of light in vacuo and the principle of relativity (developed in Section VII)
Translation (Japanese):
相対性理論の出現以前は、物理学において時間の記述は絶対的な意義を持つ、すなわち参照体の運動状態に無関係であるということが、暗黙のうちに常に仮定されていた。しかし、われわれはちょうど今、この仮定が同時性の最も自然な定義と相容れないことを見た。この仮定を捨てるならば、真空中における光の伝播の法則と相対性原理（第VII節で展開された）との間の矛盾は消え去るのである。
Evaluator Feedback:
Accurate and faithful rendering. 'just seen' as 'ちょうど今見た' is slightly literal/awkward; parenthetical placement mildly clunky but acceptable. Register appropriate.
| Score Range | Count | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Excellent (9-10) | 0 | 0.0% |
| 🟡 Good (7-8) | 36 | 75.0% |
| 🟠 Acceptable (5-6) | 11 | 22.9% |
| 🔴 Poor (3-4) | 1 | 2.1% |
| ⚫ Failed (1-2) | 0 | 0.0% |